Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The chart compares fuel spending by income percentage of poor, middle-income, rich people in the United Kingdom and the United States.

The chart compares fuel spending by income percentage of poor, middle-income, rich people in the United Kingdom and the United States. Bal5p
The chart compares fuel spending by income percentage of poor, middle-income, rich people in the United Kingdom and the United States. Generally speaking, fuel spending percentage is in proportion to wealth in the United Kingdom, but the United States can be said to have the opposite trend. In the United Kingdom, percentage of fuel spending is positively correlated with income, although it can be seen that the richer people get, the less their fuel spending affects their income percentage. The poorest group spend from 0. 5% to 2. 5% of their income on fuel, and the middle-income spend from 2. 5% to about 4% of their income. However, under no circumstance does fuel spending take up more than 4% income in the UK. In fact, negative correlation between wealth and fuel spending percentage can be witnessed in the wealthiest group. At one point, spending percentage of the richest group falls steadily from 4% to 3% of their income. In the USA, the poorer the people the bigger a toll fuel spending takes on them. The poorest spend at least 4% of their income on fuel, and this percentage rises steeply in correlation with income until it reaches a peak at approximately 5. 2%. From this point, the percentage is negatively correlated with income, as the middle-income group spend an average of 4. 1%, and the richest group spend an average of 3. 2% of their income on fuel. Overall, correlation between fuel spending percentage and income is positive in the UK, whereas it is negative in the USA.
The chart compares
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of poor, middle-income, rich
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
United
Kingdom and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
United
States.
Generally
speaking,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
is in proportion to wealth in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
United
Kingdom,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
United
States can
be said
to have the opposite trend.

In the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
United
Kingdom,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
is
positively
correlated with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
, although it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that the richer
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
, the less their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
affects their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
. The poorest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
from 0. 5% to 2. 5% of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
, and the middle-income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
from 2.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
5%
to about 4% of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
.
However
, under no circumstance does
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
take up more than 4%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
in the UK. In fact,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
correlation between wealth and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
can
be witnessed
in the wealthiest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
. At one point,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of the richest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
falls
steadily
from 4% to 3% of their income.

In the USA, the poorer the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
the bigger a toll
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
takes on them. The poorest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
at least 4% of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
, and this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
rises
steeply
in correlation with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
until it reaches a peak at approximately 5. 2%. From this point, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
is
negatively
correlated with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
, as the middle-income
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
an average of 4. 1%, and the richest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spend
an average of 3. 2% of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
on fuel.

Overall
, correlation between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
income
is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
in the UK, whereas it is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
in the USA.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The chart compares fuel spending by income percentage of poor, middle-income, rich people in the United Kingdom and the United States.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
258 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 6band
    The comparison of the production and the consumption of rice in x country.
    The given line graph compares the quantity of rice which were produced and consumed by x country during 1990 and expectations for 2040. Whereas. , the rendered bar graph reveals the information about ratio of rice and other food crops which ate in x country. In detailed view, according to line graph...
  • 6band
    the change in car ownerships
    The line graph indicates the variation in the percentage of households that owned no car, one car and two or more cars in Great Britain during a 40-year period from 1961 to 2001. Overall, it can be seen from the graph that the car was a much less popular household item in the 1960s than it is today....
  • 5.5band
    Table shows data about 3 different types of restaurants.
    The given table depicts the cost and time spent for lunch and dinner in three various categories of restaurants. Overall, it can be noticed that Sit-Down restaurant is most expensive compared to cafeteria and fast food. . moreover people also spend their more time in Sit-Down Restaurant. To begin ...
  • 6band
    the chart below shows the percentage of household car ownership across different age groups in China between 2010 and 2014
    The figure illustrates the change in the percentages of the card per household in China over a period for five years, starting in 2010 until 2014. Overall, in 2014 the percentage of people that owned the cars was the highest in each age group while in 2010 and 2011 less people kept the cars. It is ...
  • 5.5band
    5 – year CO2 EMISSION IN JAPAN
    The bar graph above indicates carbon-dioxide emission in Japan through a period of 5 years starting from 2008 and ending at 2012. The emission levels are measured in kg/KWh. Graphically, the emission of carbon-dioxide is found to be fluctuating over the years mentioned. The amount of carbon dioxide...
  • 6band
    The chart shows the number of cars made in three countries from 2003-2009.
    The table gives information about the amount of cars manufactured in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009. Overall, Argentina and Thailand witnessed an ascending trend in the number of car produced, while the opposite was the case in Australia At the start of the period, the number ...





Get more results for topic:
  • The chart compares fuel spending by income percentage of poor, middle-income, rich people in the United Kingdom and the United States.