Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.

The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on five different categories by the French and British in 2010. Overall, the British spent more than the French on cars, books and cameras. Both countries spent the most on cars. While the French spent the least on cameras, for the British, the least consumed of these five items was perfume. Both countries spent nearly the same amount on computers. The British spent more on cars, books and cameras than the French. The British spent 450, 000 pounds on cars, and it was 50, 000 pounds more than what the French spent on cars. 400, 000 pounds were spent on books by the residents of the UK, compared with the 300, 000 pounds spent by the French. The most noticeable difference between British and French spending was on cameras. While the British spent 350, 000 pounds on cameras, the French spent only 150, 000 on this item. By contrast, the residents of France spent / expended more money on computers and perfume than the British. As for computers, the French spent around 50, 000 pounds more than the British. Likewise, the spending on perfume by the French also was more than over 50, 000 pounds than the British, with 200, 000 pounds and just under 150, 000 pounds respectively.

The bar chart illustrates the amount of money You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on five This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 categories by the French and British in 2010. Overall
, the British You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 more than the French on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
, books and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
. Both countries You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 the most on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
. While the French You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 the least on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
, for the British, the least consumed of these five items was perfume. Both countries You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
nearly
 the same amount on computers.

The British You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 more on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
, books and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
 than the French. The British You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 450, 000 pounds on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
, and it was 50, 000 pounds more than what the French You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
. 400, 000 pounds were You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on books by the residents of the UK, compared with the 300, 000 pounds You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 by the French. The most noticeable difference between British and French spending was on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
. While the British You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 350, 000 pounds on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
, the French You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 150, 000 on this item.

By contrast, the residents of France You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 / expended more money on computers and perfume than the British. As for computers, the French You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 around 50, 000 pounds more than the British. Likewise
, the spending on perfume by the French also
 was more than over 50, 000 pounds than the British, with 200, 000 pounds and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 under 150, 000 pounds respectively
. 