Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

the chart below show the comparison of different kind of energy production of French in 2 years

the chart below show the comparison of different kind of energy production of French in 2 years DOop
The given two pie charts illustrate the proportion of five sorts of resources namely: coal, gas, petro, nuclear and other sources which were used for producing energy in Prance over a period of 10 years, starting from 1995. Overall, it is clear that coal and gas were the most significant energy sources at any time. Collectively, they always accounted for over a half in the production chart. By contrast, the production of energy from nuclear, petro and other kinds of sources made up a very small percentage. Coal and gas both experienced a marginal growth of about one percent from 1995 to 2005. To be more specific, in 1995, the energy produced by coal consisted of 29, 8 percent and then rose to 30, 93 in 2005. Likewise, gas was used for producing energy increased from 29, 63 percent to 30, 31 percent. With regard to nuclear and other sources, they both show an upward trend during the recorded time. The percentage of energy production by nuclear and other sources increased by 3, 7 percent and 4, 2 percent respectively. Worth mentioning is petro was the only source that followed a sharp decrease of approximately 10 percent.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
two pie charts illustrate the proportion of five sorts of resources
namely
: coal,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
petro
, nuclear and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
which were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for producing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in Prance over a period of 10 years, starting from 1995.

Overall
, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that coal and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
were the most significant
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
at any time.
Collectively
, they always accounted for over a half in the production chart. By contrast, the production of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
from nuclear,
Possible spelling mistake found.
petro
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
kinds of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
made up a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
percentage.

Coal and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
both experienced a marginal growth of about one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
from 1995 to 2005. To be more specific, in 1995, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
produced by coal consisted of 29, 8
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
and then rose to 30, 93 in 2005.
Likewise
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for producing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
increased from 29, 63
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
to 30, 31 percent.

With regard to nuclear and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
, they both
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
an upward trend during the recorded time. The percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
production by nuclear and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
increased by 3, 7
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
and 4, 2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
respectively
. Worth mentioning is
Possible spelling mistake found.
petro
was the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
that followed a sharp decrease of approximately 10
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic the chart below show the comparison of different kind of energy production of French in 2 years

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
197 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts