The chart below gives information about the number of pet owners from World Pet Organisation
The chart below gives information about the number of pet owners from World Pet Organisation OlDMj
The given chart presents the comparison of pet owners in six countries which include Wales, Canada, America, Ireland, Scotland, and England between the year 1990 and 1998.
Overall, total number of individuals that had pets fluctuated over 9 years span. In 1994 showed the highest number, while after that one year, the smallest number occurred.
In the fifth year, it showed the figure of more than 900, 000 which had the highest number of pet owners in that period of time. While America and Scotland contributed the most in that particular year with nearly a half of all number in 1994. In contrast, Ireland contributed the least.
In 1995 however, saw the decrease to less than 800, 000. This year was the year that had the least amount of pet owners in 9 years period. Unlike last year America was one of the countries that distributed the least, the other country was Wales. Likewise, Ireland was still the least when it comes to the distribution.
The
given
chart presents the comparison of pet owners in six countries which include Wales, Canada, America, Ireland, Scotland, and England between the
year
1990 and 1998.
Overall
, total
number
of individuals that had
pets
fluctuated over 9 years span. In 1994
showed
the highest
number
, while after that one
year
, the smallest
number
occurred.
In the fifth
year
, it
showed
the figure of more than 900, 000 which had the highest
number
of pet owners in that period of time. While America and Scotland contributed the most in that particular
year
with
nearly
a half of all
number
in 1994.
In contrast
, Ireland contributed the least.
In 1995
however
,
saw
the decrease to less than 800, 000. This
year
was the
year
that had the least amount of pet owners in 9 years period. Unlike last
year
America was one of the countries that distributed the least, the other country was Wales.
Likewise
, Ireland was
still
the least when it
comes
to the distribution.