The given table illustrates the comparative data about how much car manufacturers in the UK spent on five types of advertisments in 2002. At first glance, it is obvious that all four of the car renders paid out the vast majority of money for the TV promotion while the least investment was made for the cinema adverts. In terms of TV advertising, Cetirizine was the highest spender at 70 mln $, followed by Vauxhall and Renault spent 65 mln $ and 59 mln $, respectively, while Rover occupied bottom-most position by expending 45 mln $. Considering press promotion, Renault and Rover took the lead at 45 mln $ and 38 mln $, correspondingly, whereas Vauxhall occupied the last spot at 8 mln $. Interestingly, in radio adverts all four of the car brends made the same investment at 15 mln $, singly. With regards to outdoor and cinema advertising, Renault and Vauxhall companies spent less than 10 mln $ for each category, while Rover and Cetirizine brends expended a very small number at about 3 mln $ for outdoor promoting. The figure for the investment in cinema adverts by both Rover and Cetirizine accounted for zero, separately, during the given period.
The
given
table illustrates the comparative data about how much car manufacturers in the UK spent on five types of
advertisments
in 2002. At
first
glance, it is obvious that all four of the car renders paid out the vast majority of money for the TV promotion while the least investment
was made
for the cinema adverts. In terms of TV advertising,
Cetirizine
was the highest spender at 70
mln
$, followed by
Vauxhall
and Renault spent 65
mln
$ and 59
mln
$,
respectively
, while Rover occupied bottom-most position by expending 45
mln
$. Considering press promotion, Renault and Rover took the lead at 45
mln
$ and 38
mln
$,
correspondingly
, whereas
Vauxhall
occupied the last spot at 8
mln
$.
Interestingly
, in radio adverts all four of the car
brends
made the same investment at 15
mln
$,
singly
.
With regards to
outdoor and cinema advertising, Renault and
Vauxhall
companies
spent less than 10
mln
$ for each category, while Rover and
Cetirizine
brends
expended a
very
small
number at about 3
mln
$ for outdoor promoting. The figure for the investment in cinema adverts by both Rover and
Cetirizine
accounted for zero,
separately
, during the
given
period.