Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

statistics for the 1990s and 2010s of British people handing money to charities.

statistics for the 1990s and 2010s of British people handing money to charities. Mmoxa
The graph below shows statistics for the 1990s and 2010s of British people handing money to charities. The chart shows that in the 1990s the donations increased in the first three ranges, after the range of 36-50 years it declined a bit, so basically it was a good year because they received a good percentage of donations since the lowest point was 15% and the highest one was 40%. Now as we can see clearly in 2010 the donations fall in the range of 18-25 in comparison to 1990, since the lowest point was 5%, but if we look at the other ranges we can see that it is still lower than the other year but it goes up and we can call that a steady growth from the first three ranges. A point that intrigues me is if we look at the range 51-65 and >65 we can see that the donations were higher than in 1990. To conclude we can say that 1990 fared better in the first three ranks and 2010 succeed in the last two ranges.
The graph below
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
statistics for the 1990s and 2010s of British
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
handing money to charities.

The chart
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that in the 1990s the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
donations
increased in the
first
three
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ranges
, after the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
range
of 36-50 years it declined a bit,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
basically
it was a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
year
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they received a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
donations
since the lowest point was 15% and the highest one was 40%.

This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Now
as we can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
clearly
in 2010 the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
donations
fall in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
range
of 18-25
in comparison
to 1990, since the lowest point was 5%,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
if we look at the other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ranges
we can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
that it is
still
lower than the other year
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it goes
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
up and
we can call that a steady growth from the
first
three
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ranges
. A point that intrigues me is if we look at the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
range
51-65 and >65 we can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
donations
were higher than in 1990.

To conclude
we can say that 1990 fared better in the
first
three ranks and 2010 succeed in the last two
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ranges
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic statistics for the 1990s and 2010s of British people handing money to charities.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
180 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts