Some people say that with the development of modern technology printed books, magazines lose their importance. To what extent do you agree or not?
Some people say that with the development of modern technology printed books, magazines lose their importance.  G9eXw
In this modern era, technology is growing at a faster pace than in the past. It is believed by some that books, magazines and news lose their importance owing to advancement in the digital media. Can books be replaced by high-tech? I completely disagree with this statement, and I believe it has two reasons: limited access to the internet at some places and, along with unreliable information available on the internet.
To begin with, having access to printed resources is beneficial for some people who do not have access to the internet connection. That is to say, unfortunately, there are few people in today’s world, who can not afford the expenses of the internet, thus, they depend on printed books and magazines for any information. Newspapers are still one of the most popular sources of information, for instance, in India. As there are many parts in India, where people cannot reach technology.
Perhaps more importantly, availability of unreliable information on the internet. To put it simply, one can not totally rely on the information that is available on the internet as it could not be true, which could lead to spreading misleading information among people. Unlike technology, printed materials contain authentic information, which is less likely to misguide people. If books carry information which is not true, the author will face detrimental consequences. Hence, information that is printed not only reliable, but also more authentic than information available online.
To conclude, it is argued by some people that printed media is losing its importance due to technological progress. However, I disagree with this as the majority of people have access to books, unlike, technology and information available on books is more reliable. 
In this modern era, technology is growing at a faster pace than in the past. It  
is believed
 by  
some
 that  
books
, magazines and news lose their importance owing to advancement in the digital media. Can  
books
  be replaced
 by high-tech? I completely disagree with this statement, and I believe it has two reasons: limited  
access
 to the internet at  
some
 places and, along with unreliable  
information
  available
 on the internet.
To  
begin
 with, having  
access
 to  
printed
 resources is beneficial for  
some
  people
 who do not have  
access
 to the internet connection.  
That is
 to say, unfortunately, there are few  
people
 in  
today
’s world, who can not afford the expenses of the internet,  
thus
, they depend on  
printed
  books
 and magazines for any  
information
. Newspapers are  
still
 one of the most popular sources of  
information
,  
for instance
, in India. As there are  
many
 parts in India, where  
people
 cannot reach technology.
Perhaps more  
importantly
, availability of unreliable  
information
 on the internet. To put it  
simply
, one can not  
totally
 rely on the  
information
  that is
  available
 on the internet as it could not be true, which could lead to spreading misleading  
information
 among  
people
. Unlike technology,  
printed
 materials contain authentic  
information
, which is less likely to misguide  
people
. If  
books
 carry  
information
 which is not true, the author will face detrimental consequences.  
Hence
,  
information
  that is
  printed
 not  
only
 reliable,  
but
  also
 more authentic than  
information
  available
 online. 
To conclude
, it  
is argued
 by  
some
  people
 that  
printed
 media is losing its importance due to technological progress.  
However
, I disagree with this as the majority of  
people
 have  
access
 to  
books
, unlike, technology and  
information
  available
 on  
books
 is more reliable.