The graph demonstrates the recycling rate for different materials from 1982 to 2010. Comparing all materials, paper and cardboard had the highest recycling percentage, while plastics was the lowest.
The paper and cardboard recycling patterns are similar in the increase and decrease percentage, whereaes the aluminium had a big and consistent movement since it started. Plastics were the least progressing in the chart and held a very low move.
Firstly, papers showed somewhat steady rates of recycling throughout the years, maintaing 60-70% with an increase in the 1990's to about 80%, followed by glass containers, which had a lower percentage of 50-60% and dropping to 40% in 1990, but with continuos rise towards 2010.
Secondly, the recycling solutions for aluminium did not exist until 1986 but had a major and steady climb for up to 45% in 2010, compared to the plastics that were not recycled until 1990 and since then have only increased by 9%.
The graph demonstrates the
recycling
rate for
different
materials from 1982 to 2010. Comparing all materials, paper and cardboard had the highest
recycling
percentage, while plastics was the lowest.
The paper and cardboard
recycling
patterns are similar in the increase and decrease percentage,
whereaes
the
aluminium
had a
big
and consistent movement since it
started
. Plastics were the least progressing in the chart and held a
very
low
move
.
Firstly
, papers
showed
somewhat steady rates of
recycling
throughout the years,
maintaing
60-70% with an increase in the
1990's
to about 80%, followed by glass containers, which had a lower percentage of 50-60% and dropping to 40% in 1990,
but
with
continuos
rise towards 2010.
Secondly
, the
recycling
solutions for
aluminium
did not exist until 1986
but
had a major and steady climb for up to 45% in 2010, compared to the plastics that were not recycled until 1990 and since then have
only
increased by 9%.