Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

rates us, three method of waste disposal among European coun

rates us, three method of waste disposal among European coun GJwPw
This chart illustrates us, three method of waste disposal among European countries in 2005, 2006 and 2008. Most common approach for got rid of rubbish was landfill. Usage of this method decreased 20 percent in 2006 and was 1600 million tonnes. In 2008, landfill dropped to 1200 million tonnes. About burning everything was different. This approach experienced fluctuation. In 2005, burning was 900 million tonnes and it went up to 1200 million tonnes next year. However, in 2008 fell to 900 million tonnes again. The last method is dumping in the sea. Dumping in the sea unlike the others method rose gradually throw these years. In 2005 the waste disposal with this method was 1200 million tonnes and in the next year increased to about 1400 and eventually reached 1600 million tonnes. In conclusion, dumping in sea usage was only three-fifth of landfill in 2005 but everything had changed throw this years and disposed by dumping in the sea was thirty percent more than landfill in 2008.
This chart illustrates us, three
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
of waste disposal among European countries in 2005, 2006 and 2008.

Most common approach for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
got
rid of rubbish was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
. Usage of this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
decreased 20 percent in 2006 and was 1600
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes. In 2008,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
dropped to 1200
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes. About burning everything was
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
. This approach experienced fluctuation. In 2005, burning was 900
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes and it went up to 1200
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes
next
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
.
However
, in 2008 fell to 900
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes again. The last
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dumping
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Dumping
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
unlike the
Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "others'" or "other's"?
others
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
rose
gradually
throw these years. In 2005 the waste disposal with this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
was 1200
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes and in the
next
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
increased to about 1400 and
eventually
reached 1600
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes.

In conclusion
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dumping
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
usage was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
three-fifth of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
in 2005
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
everything had
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changed
throw
It seems that a possessive apostrophe is missing.
this years
and disposed by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dumping
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
was thirty percent more than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
in 2008.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic rates us, three method of waste disposal among European coun

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
167 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts