The line graph compares the percentage of unemployed recent graduates and young non-graduates in the age group 21-30 in the period from 1990 to 2015.
Generally, most of the changes occurred in the middle years of the graph chart, with progressive variation until we reached a proportion equal to 1990 in 2015.
In the initial years, between 1990 and 1995, the percentage of jobless in both groups gradually dropped. By contrast, the chart has risen sharply in recent years, from 2010 to 2015, yet unemployed recent grads would account for approximately 10% of the total, while unemployed young non-graduates were considered for less than a fifth of the total. Furthermore, there was a sharp drop in both categories of recent graduates and young non-graduates between 1995 and 2000, resulting in a small number of jobless recent graduates and non-graduates. In the other perspective, the percentage of jobless recent graduates stayed constant between 2000 and 2010. In the opposing group, however, there was a modest decrease between 2000 and 2005. Nevertheless, the proportion of young non-graduates increased rapidly between 2005 and 2010.
The line graph compares the percentage of unemployed
recent
graduates
and
young
non-graduates in the age group 21-30 in the period from 1990 to 2015.
Generally
, most of the
changes
occurred in the middle years of the graph chart, with progressive variation until we reached a proportion equal to 1990 in 2015.
In the initial years, between 1990 and 1995, the percentage of jobless in both groups
gradually
dropped. By contrast, the chart has risen
sharply
in
recent
years, from 2010 to 2015,
yet
unemployed
recent
grads would account for approximately 10% of the total, while unemployed
young
non-graduates
were considered
for less than a fifth of the total.
Furthermore
, there was a sharp drop in both categories of
recent
graduates
and
young
non-graduates between 1995 and 2000, resulting in a
small
number of jobless
recent
graduates
and non-graduates.
In the other perspective
, the percentage of jobless
recent
graduates
stayed constant between 2000 and 2010. In the opposing group,
however
, there was a modest decrease between 2000 and 2005.
Nevertheless
, the proportion of
young
non-graduates increased
rapidly
between 2005 and 2010.