The impact of large shopping malls replacing small local shops, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. While some people believe that it is a positive development, others completely disagree with this notion. This essay will elaborate both sides of the debate, and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why replacing small local shops is a positive development, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it brings more convenience to the hands of the shoppers. Consumers can just find everything they need from apparel to daily groceries in one place. An instance illustrating this action is the fact that Australian shoppers admit to save more than two hours shopping in large centers rather than in small local businesses. Furthermore, shopping malls help boost the economic by attracting large international investments. For example, global brands such as Gucci, Channel, Nike, Adidas and many more have opened their branches across several malls in Australia.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that small businesses being replaced is actually a negative thing to consider. It is largely attributed to the fact that shopping centers are crowding out and killing businesses. Consumers tend to spend money in big brands more than helping small business owners to put the food on their tables. For instance, the increase of 50% in shopping malls results in the surge of bankruptcy and collapse of many small businesses. Furthermore, shopping in large mall could be costly. This is because 80% of products sold here are twice the price in the outdoor markets.
In conclusion, while there are strong arguments on both sides of the debate, I strongly believe that large shopping centers replacing small businesses is not a positive development.
The impact of
large
shopping
malls
replacing
small
local shops, which was always debatable, has
now
become more controversial. While
some
people
believe that it is a
positive
development, others completely disagree with this notion. This essay will elaborate both sides of the debate, and
thus
lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why replacing
small
local shops is a
positive
development,
but
the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it brings more convenience to the hands of the shoppers. Consumers can
just
find everything they need from apparel to daily groceries in one place. An instance illustrating this action is the fact that Australian shoppers
admit to save
more than two hours
shopping
in
large
centers
rather
than in
small
local
businesses
.
Furthermore
,
shopping
malls
help
boost the economic by attracting
large
international investments.
For example
, global brands such as Gucci, Channel, Nike, Adidas and
many
more have opened their branches across several
malls
in Australia.
Nevertheless
,
some
people
adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that
small
businesses
being replaced
is actually a
negative
thing to consider. It is
largely
attributed to the fact that
shopping
centers are crowding out and killing
businesses
. Consumers tend to spend money in
big
brands more than helping
small
business
owners to put the food on their tables.
For instance
, the increase of 50% in
shopping
malls
results in the surge of bankruptcy and collapse of
many
small
businesses
.
Furthermore
,
shopping
in
large
mall
could be costly. This is
because
80% of products sold here are twice the price in the outdoor markets.
In conclusion
, while there are strong arguments on both sides of the debate, I
strongly
believe that
large
shopping
centers replacing
small
businesses
is not a
positive
development.