Incidents and injuries for 100 million pmt ,2002.
Incidents and injuries for 100 million pmt, 2002. m9ygK
The rendered bar graph compares and contrast the differences associated with the number of incidents and injuries per million PMT( passenger miles travelled ) by different kinds of transportation named; commuter rail, heavy rail, bus and demand response during 2002. Overall, at first glance, it can be reported that, while demand response was highest number of incidents and injuries maximum figure of incidents by demand response. Additionally, commuter rail shows the least number of injuries. In detail it is worth noting that, in 2002, the numerals of person that was get incidents by demand response reported significantly higher with 225 as compare to injuries which was accounted for 173. Besides this, it is interesting to note that, the figure of passengers who were got incidents and injuries reached reported at 76 and 66 respectively. Moreover, it can bi clearly observed that, numbering of travellers whose travelled by light rail they had witnessed double in the case of incidents (76) as compare to injuries and the figure registered to 39. Although, about 35 number of visitors who had injured to heavy rail was dramatically higher to 51 in the case of incidents. Furthermore, the calculation of outsiders suffer by commuter rail and which were injured and incidents accounted between 17 and 20 of which max number of passengers incidents ( 20), while least by injuries (17).
The rendered bar graph compares and contrast the differences associated with the
number
of
incidents
and
injuries
per million PMT
(
passenger miles travelled
)
by
different
kinds of transportation named; commuter
rail
, heavy
rail
, bus and
demand
response
during 2002.
Overall
, at
first
glance, it can
be reported
that, while
demand
response
was
highest
number
of
incidents
and
injuries
maximum figure of
incidents
by
demand
response
.
Additionally
, commuter
rail
shows
the least
number
of
injuries
. In
detail it
is worth noting that, in 2002, the numerals of person that was
get
incidents
by
demand
response
reported
significantly
higher with 225 as compare to
injuries
which
was accounted
for 173.
Besides
this, it is interesting to note that, the figure of passengers who were
got
incidents
and
injuries
reached reported at 76 and 66
respectively
.
Moreover
, it
can bi
clearly
observed that, numbering of
travellers
whose travelled by light
rail
they had witnessed double in the case of
incidents
(76) as compare to
injuries
and the figure registered to 39.
Although
, about 35
number
of visitors who had injured to heavy
rail
was
dramatically
higher to 51 in the case of
incidents
.
Furthermore
, the calculation of outsiders suffer by commuter
rail
and which
were injured
and
incidents
accounted between 17 and 20 of which max
number
of passengers
incidents
(
20), while least by
injuries
(17).