Images of the stories of the most news are being published on print media and digital media on regular basis. A number of peoples think that images are carry the more content than the words which is extremely efficient. I do agree with the statement, while said that both sides of factor can be discussed, since it’s an individual choice of receivers.
Obviously, visuals can talk lot of words even though it has not a sound feature. Key objective of the media reporting is carry a powerful message to readers and viewers within the limited time period and space availability. Therefore, an attractive image to be used in order to balance and increase the quality and productivity of messages. I also a big fan of believing that visuals can talk more than words. In example, showing an image of place is more attractive and easy than describing the particular place in words.
On other hand, there can be situations where words must be used and individual images cannot be communicated the right meaning. In addition, if you use only pictures without words, readers may be get various kind of meaning subject to their individual views. For illustration, when you presenting a complicate visual with the line/bar chart which may difficult to understand and readers may get mislead about the message.
In conclusion, using more visuals on the news are acceptable in the print or on digital Medias than using more words. Even though I agreed to the using more images, there are situations where readers and viewers are more concern about the words. Due to the fact, most of time best way is using the combination of both options which give an effective and clear structure
Images
of the stories of the most news are
being published
on print
media
and digital
media
on regular basis. A number of peoples
think
that
images
are carry the more content than the words which is
extremely
efficient. I do
agree
with the statement, while said that both sides of factor can
be discussed
, since it’s an individual choice of receivers.
Obviously
,
visuals
can talk
lot of
words
even though
it has not a sound feature. Key objective of the
media
reporting is carry a powerful message to readers and viewers within the limited time period and space availability.
Therefore
, an attractive
image
to be
used
in order to balance and increase the quality and productivity of messages. I
also
a
big
fan of believing that
visuals
can talk more than words. In example, showing an
image
of place is more attractive and easy than describing the particular place in words.
On other hand, there can be situations where words
must
be
used
and individual
images
cannot
be communicated
the right meaning.
In addition
, if you
use
only
pictures without words, readers may be
get
various kind of meaning subject to their individual views. For illustration, when
you presenting
a complicate
visual with the line/bar chart which may difficult to understand and readers may
get
mislead about the message.
In conclusion
, using more
visuals
on the news are acceptable in the print or on digital
Medias
than using more words.
Even though
I
agreed
to the using more
images
, there are situations where readers and viewers are more concern about the words. Due to the fact,
most of time
best way is using the combination of both options which give an effective and
clear
structure