The pie chart gives a breakdown of the type of food eaten by two groups of students, whilst the table highlights some features of their health.
At first glance, it is clear that Group A students’ diet consists of more vegetables and fruit but less fat content. This may explain why students of Group B suffer more health problems and have lower attendance rates.
According to the pie charts, there are similarities and differences with regard to the two groups’ diets. In both groups, about a third of the food students eat consists of cereals. Similarly, they eat an equal proportion of fish (5%). However, the percentage of high-fat food eaten by Group B is considerably higher than in Group A and slightly smaller than the amount of fresh fruit.
Looking at the table for more details, there are twice as many overweight people in Group B as in Group A, with the figures being 20% and 10% respectively. What is more, Group B has experienced a much higher rate of illness over the year, at 15% and 5% in turn. This has resulted in a 15% lower attendance rate.
The pie chart gives a breakdown of the type of food eaten by two
groups
of
students
, whilst the table highlights
some
features of their health.
At
first
glance, it is
clear
that
Group
A
students’
diet consists of more vegetables and fruit
but
less
fat
content. This may
explain
why
students
of
Group
B suffer more health problems and have lower attendance rates.
According to the pie charts, there are similarities and differences with regard to the two
groups’
diets. In both
groups
, about a third of the food
students
eat consists of cereals.
Similarly
, they eat an equal proportion of fish (5%).
However
, the percentage of high-
fat
food eaten by
Group
B is
considerably
higher than in
Group
A and
slightly
smaller than the amount of fresh fruit.
Looking at the table for more
details
, there are twice as
many
overweight
people
in
Group
B as in
Group
A, with the figures being 20% and 10%
respectively
.
What is more
,
Group
B has experienced a much higher rate of illness over the year, at 15% and 5% in turn. This has resulted in a 15% lower attendance rate.