Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Governments should spend money on rail ways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In more expend point of view, public transportation is more beneficial than private transportation. Trains are one kind of public transportation. So that, a lot may say we should invest on them. The first advantage of public transportation is the cost of private transportation. As in many metropolitan cities, the charts has been showing a large scale of cars have just one person passenger, consequently at least five times more pressure on natural and economical resources. A very large scale research in Tehran, the capital of Iran, had been done a few years ago, which emphasized the prephrase of research. The prephase was that 10 present of cars in Tehran have just one person passanger. Besides of that, the enviromental issues are the most significant element in making desicion about the problem. In todays roads clean cars are just luxuries and unusual, because of that more roads means more cars and it will leads us to use more fosseil fuels. Finally every body knows that fosseil fuels are the main cause of air pulution. At the end, one the most harmful affective features of cars on human is noise pulution. It will cause a lot of sprit desseases which have very consistance influence on social behaviour of people, like in tolerance, stress, depression, and so on. In result, It is so obvious that rail ways are more wiseful investment for governments, from cost-beneficial, green and pro-enviroment, human and social effects, point of view. From cost beneficial point of, public transportation are cheap and less expensive. At the green and enviroment sight is clean and non-pulution compare to the cars. Finally, through human and social effects frames is more compatible to a wellbeing life style and the ways we should live.
In more expend point of view,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
is more beneficial than private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
. Trains are one kind of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
that, a lot may say we should invest on them. The
first
advantage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
is the cost of private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
. As in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
metropolitan cities, the charts has been showing a large scale of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
one person passenger,
consequently
at least five times more pressure on natural and
Did you mean “economic” (=connected with economy)?
economical
resources. A
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
large scale research in Tehran, the capital of Iran, had
been done
a few years ago, which emphasized the
Possible spelling mistake found.
prephrase
of research. The
Possible spelling mistake found.
prephase
was that 10 present of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
in Tehran have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
one person
Possible spelling mistake found.
passanger
.
Besides
of that, the
Possible spelling mistake found.
enviromental
issues are the most significant element in making
Possible spelling mistake found.
desicion
about the problem. In
It seems that a possessive apostrophe is missing.
todays
roads clean
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
luxuries and unusual,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of that more roads means more
Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
cars and
it will
The modal verb ‘will’ requires the verb’s base form.
leads
us to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
more
Possible spelling mistake found.
fosseil
fuels.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Finally
every body knows that
Possible spelling mistake found.
fosseil
fuels are the main cause of air
Possible spelling mistake found.
pulution
. At the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
, one the most harmful affective features of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
on human is noise
Possible spelling mistake found.
pulution
. It will cause
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
Possible spelling mistake found.
sprit
Possible spelling mistake found.
desseases
which have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
Possible spelling mistake found.
consistance
influence on social
Possible spelling mistake. ‘behaviour’ is British English.
behaviour
of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
, like in tolerance,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stress
, depression, and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
on. In result, It is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
obvious that
This noun is normally spelled as one word.
rail ways
are more
Possible spelling mistake found.
wiseful
investment for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
, from cost-beneficial, green and
Possible spelling mistake found.
pro-enviroment
, human and social effects, point of view. From cost beneficial point of,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transportation
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cheap
and less expensive. At the green and
Possible spelling mistake found.
enviroment
sight is clean and
Possible spelling mistake found.
non-pulution
compare to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
.
Finally
, through human and social effects frames is more compatible to a wellbeing
This noun is normally spelled as one word.
life style
and the ways we should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic Governments should spend money on rail ways rather than roads. with this statement?

Academic
  American English
1 paragraphs
290 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts