Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

family categories proportion in Australia which lived under poverty in 1999

family categories proportion in Australia which lived under poverty in 1999 xgWp6
The table below illustrates many family categories proportion in Australia which lived under poverty in 1999. Overall, the total amount of all house holds which lived under prosperity was 1, 837, 000. Specifically, sole parent became the type of family which had the highest proportion amount. Meanwhile, the next category, namely the single person with no children, led in the second place, by reaching 359, 000. On the contrary, the aged couple was known as the category which has the lowest percentage to be lived in poverty. The total amount of this category was only 48, 000. Subsequently, the other category, namely, single person who was aged and lived under the poor economy condition, was reaching 54, 000. Apart from that, the couple who had not children, had approximately fourfold amount of the aged unmarried person who lived in that condition. This kind of couple was reaching 211. 000. . On the other case, the poor couple who lived with their children was amounted as many as 933, 000.
The table below illustrates
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
family
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
categories
proportion in Australia which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lived
under poverty in 1999.
Overall
, the total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of all
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
house
holds which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lived
under prosperity was 1, 837, 000.

Specifically
, sole parent became the type of family which had the highest proportion
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
. Meanwhile, the
next
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
category
,
namely
the single person with no children, led in the second place, by reaching 359, 000.

On the contrary
, the aged
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couple
was known
as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
category
which has the lowest percentage to be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lived
in poverty. The total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
category
was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
48, 000.
Subsequently
, the other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
category
,
namely
, single person
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
was aged
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lived
under the poor economy condition, was reaching 54, 000. Apart from that, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couple
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
had not children, had approximately fourfold
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of the aged unmarried person
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lived
in that condition. This kind of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couple
was reaching 211. 000.
Don't put a space before the full stop
.
On the other case, the poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couple
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lived
with their children
was amounted
as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
as 933, 000.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic family categories proportion in Australia which lived under poverty in 1999

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
169 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • family categories proportion in Australia which lived under poverty in 1999