Describe the difference between given two maps

The given map proposed a number of alteration in the village of stokeford between 1930 and 2010. To embark with, the northern region of map, the farmland on the east of bridge had completely devastated, where the new house had constructed(similarly, the all shop was converted in order to build new home for residents). The primary school for pupils had reconstructed with the enhancement of area, for education of small children. Else, bridge and post office had not gone with any drastic change. Moving further towards the south of map, the farmland in behind to the post office branching off in description to form a rectangular attractive chain of houses, which further going at the adjacent side of river stroke. Moreover, the residential area for retired person had been made, in 2010, at place of gardens as well as of a large house. While, there was an undeveloped area at both sides of river stroke, in 2010. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that there had been many chance occurs between the given years in 2010, where some places were completely demolished and new things were established.