Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graphs below show the number of public transit passengers from 1989 to 2009 and bus and tram passenger numbers between 2000 and 2008 in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The graphs below show the number of public transit passengers from 1989 to 2009 and bus and tram passenger numbers between 2000 and 2008 in Melbourne. 96Yj7
The first line graph gives information on the number of passengers using public transportations in a span of two decades commencing from 1989 to 2009, while the second one illustrates the figure for bus and tram commuters during the period of 8 years since 2000 in Melbourne. From a cursory glance, it is evident that in the first line graph, the number of public transit commuters was on an upward trajectory. As illuminated in the second graph, there was an incessant increase in the bus passenger numbers, while tram passenger numbers witnessed a fluctuation. A closer insight into the first graph reveals that in the first 5 years, the statistics of commuters using public transportations hovered around 280 million, while in the next decade, the figure experienced a steady increase to about 350 million and in the last quarter of the surveyed period, the number of public transit passengers significantly rose to 500 million. Going into detail on the second graph, the number of bus and tram commuters remained stable in the initial quarter of the studied period at about 110 million and 140 million respectively. During the rest 6 years, bus passenger number observed a robust expansion and reached a staggering peak at about 220 million, whereas the statistics of tram commuters shared a fluctuation from 2002 to 2006 and then saw an enormous increase to 200 million in 2008.
The
first
line
graph
gives information on the
number
of
passengers
using
public
transportations in a span of two decades commencing from 1989 to 2009, while the second one illustrates the figure for bus and tram
commuters
during the period of 8 years since 2000 in Melbourne.

From a cursory glance, it is evident that in the
first
line
graph
, the
number
of
public
transit
commuters
was on an upward trajectory. As illuminated in the second
graph
, there was an incessant increase in the bus
passenger
numbers
, while tram
passenger
numbers
witnessed a fluctuation.

A closer insight into the
first
graph
reveals that in the
first
5 years, the statistics of
commuters
using
public
transportations hovered around 280
million
, while in the
next
decade, the figure experienced a steady increase to about 350
million
and in the last quarter of the surveyed period, the
number
of
public
transit
passengers
significantly
rose to 500 million.

Going into detail on the second
graph
, the
number
of bus and tram
commuters
remained stable in the initial quarter of the studied period at about 110
million
and 140
million
respectively
. During the rest 6 years, bus
passenger
number
observed a robust expansion and reached a staggering peak at about 220
million
, whereas the statistics of tram
commuters
shared a fluctuation from 2002 to 2006 and then
saw
an enormous increase to 200
million
in 2008.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graphs below show the number of public transit passengers from 1989 to 2009 and bus and tram passenger numbers between 2000 and 2008 in Melbourne.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
231 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts