It is true that benefits packages are always one of the highest-ranking concerns that would draw every employee’s attention. In reality, each business conceives different terms of this problem. A body of opinion supports that companies should reward employees with the same benefits packages. From my point of view, I am not in agreement with this idea. The following essay may explain these points in detail.
The first reason for this is because it appears to be extremely unfair for the staff that has been serving long terms. They not only dedicate all their might and strength to the company's sustainable development but they also become an irreplaceable part of the operating system. Their cumulative experiences and skills play a crucial role in steering the new generation and proactively curbing the level of danger in emergent situations. An increase in the benefit packages would show the company appreciation for all of their hard work, foster loyalty, and thus boost their working morale in years to come.
In addition to the reason above, I also believe that offering different benefit packages would be a stepping stone to attract new employees in the context of such a competitive job market. This is viewed as a mandatory term that all firms should map out to retain the right talents and indispensable criteria for all job seekers. For example, a disparity among departments in holiday leave, overtime working bonuses may match their generic mentality while contemplating several job offers.
In conclusion, I believe that companies should consider establishing different benefit packages based on certain positions and the time each employee has devoted in terms of creating equality for the long-serving staffs in the workplace and an opportunity to hire the competent personnel that would lead the company in the near future.
It is true that
benefits
packages
are always one of the highest-ranking concerns that would draw every
employee’s
attention. In reality, each business conceives
different
terms of this problem. A body of opinion supports that
companies
should reward
employees
with the same
benefits
packages
. From my point of view, I am not in agreement with this
idea
. The following essay may
explain
these points in detail.
The
first
reason for this is
because
it appears to be
extremely
unfair for the staff that has been serving long terms. They not
only
dedicate all their might and strength to the
company
's sustainable development
but
they
also
become an irreplaceable part of the operating system. Their cumulative experiences and
skills
play a crucial role in steering the new generation and
proactively
curbing the level of
danger
in emergent situations. An increase in the
benefit
packages
would
show
the
company
appreciation for all of their
hard
work, foster loyalty, and
thus
boost their working morale in years to
come
.
In addition
to the reason above, I
also
believe that offering
different
benefit
packages
would be a stepping stone to attract new
employees
in the context of such a competitive job market. This
is viewed
as a mandatory
term
that all firms should map out to retain the right talents and indispensable criteria for all job seekers.
For example
, a disparity among departments in holiday
leave
, overtime working bonuses may match their generic mentality while contemplating several job offers.
In conclusion
, I believe that
companies
should consider establishing
different
benefit
packages
based on certain positions and the time each
employee
has devoted in terms of creating equality for the long-serving staffs in the workplace and an opportunity to hire the competent personnel that would lead the
company
in the near future.