Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

bar graph shows expenditure on goods in uk and france in 2020

bar graph shows expenditure on goods in uk and france in 2020 BwVjj

The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on five different consumer goods in the UK and France in the year 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling. Overall, the expenditure of the UK was higher than that of France. Both countries spent the biggest amount of money on cars, while perfume was the least consumed item. Looking at the graph in more details, the UK spent 450. 000 on cars, which is 50. 000 higher than what France spent (400. 000). Likewise, the expenditure of the UK on books was approximately 400. 000, while France spent 300. 000. It is also reported that France spent less than half what the UK spent on cameras (150. 000 and just over 350. 000 respectively). On the other hand, the French spent more money on computers and perfume than did the British. While France spent around 375. 000 on computers, the UK spent 300. 000. A similar pattern is seen in perfume figures; the UK spent well under 150. 000, whereas France spent 200. 000.

The bar chart illustrates the amount of money You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on five This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 consumer This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 in the UK and France in the year 2010. Units are measured
 in pounds sterling.

Overall
, the expenditure of the UK was higher than that of France. Both countries You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 the biggest amount of money on cars, while perfume was the least consumed item.

Looking at the graph in more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :particulars
details
, the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 450. 000 on cars, which is 50. 000 higher than what France You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 (400. Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
000
). Likewise
, the expenditure of the UK on books was approximately 400. 000, while France You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 300. 000. It is also
 reported that France You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 less than half what the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on cameras (150. 000 and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 over 350. 000 respectively
).

On the other hand
, the French You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 more money on computers and perfume than did the British. While France You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 around 375. 000 on computers, the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 300. 000. A similar pattern is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 in perfume figures; the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 well under 150. 000, whereas France You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 200. 000. 