Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

BAR CHART TYPE 1: MOVEMENT DATA CHART

BAR CHART TYPE 1: MOVEMENT DATA CHART AJpwM

The given chart gives information about the number of means of transport commuted to work in one European city in three different years from 1960 to 2000 Overall, it can be seen clearly that the proportion of people who used cars to work experienced an upward trend while the opposite was true for bus, bike and foot. Also cars were chosen at least in 1960 but in 2000 it became the most common choice for people. In 1960, foot was the most popular means of transport with about 33 % followed by bike with 25%. However in 2000, the percentage of people who used foot decreased sharply, less than 10%. Similarly, the figure for bikes declined significantly to about 5% and became the least popular modes of transport in the end. By contrast, the percentage of people commuting to work by car and bus were different. In 1960, the data for buses was about 20%, 4 times as much as cars. In 1980, it increased considerably more than 25% and then declined to 17% in 2000. Besides, the figure for cars accounted for about 5 % in 1960. After that, it rose sharply to 35% in 2000.

The This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 chart gives information about the number of means of transport commuted to work in one European city in three This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 years from 1960 to 2000

Overall
, it can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
clearly
 that the proportion of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 to work experienced an upward trend while the opposite was true for bus, bike and foot. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Also,
Also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
were chosen
 at least in 1960 This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 in 2000 it became the most common choice for This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
.

In 1960, foot was the most popular means of transport with about 33 % followed by bike with 25%. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?However,
However
 in 2000, the percentage of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 foot decreased sharply
, less than 10%. Similarly
, the figure for bikes declined significantly
 to about 5% and became the least popular modes of transport in the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
.

By contrast, the percentage of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 commuting to work by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
car
 and bus were This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
. In 1960, the data for buses was about 20%, 4 times as much as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
. In 1980, it increased considerably
 more than 25% and then declined to 17% in 2000. Besides
, the figure for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 accounted for about 5 % in 1960. After that, it rose sharply
 to 35% in 2000. 