Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The following appeared in a newsletter published by the Appleton school district In a recent study more than 5 000 adolescents were asked how often they ate meals with their families Almost 30 percent of the teens said they ate at least seven meals per we

The following appeared in a newsletter published by the Appleton school district In a recent study more than 5 000 adolescents were asked how often they ate meals with their families Almost 30 percent of the teens said they ate at least seven meals per we Ajrow
In the newsletter publication, the author recommends families of adolescents to eat their meals together, in order to turn troubled teens away from bad behaviors. The author reached this conclusion based on a study, where 30% of over 5000 adolescents claimed that they eat meals with their families, and these teens were observed to be less likely to try drugs and alcohol. The author also extrapolates from the conclusions of this study, that these teens are also less likely to have low grades in school, low self esteem and depression. While the author suggestion appears sound, it relies on several unwarranted assumptions. In order to reach a conclusion, three questions must be answered. Firstly, can results from a study, in Appleton School district, be applied to other districts/ states? Or in other words, are all regions homogenous, so as the observations from one district can be assumed to also lead to same conclusions in other places? It is possible that Appleton District is a very religious district and hence, most teenages, irrespective of wether they eat meals with their families, are less likely to try drugs and alcohol. Also, it is possible that, this same district has relatively easier school curriculum and hence less students suffer from anxiety, and get better scores. If any of the above is true, then the author’s recommendation that eating meals with family will lead to less depression and better school grades, does not stand water. Secondly, how do we know that the teenagers did not lie on the survey? It is possible that the kids were scared of their teachers and parents, and hence lied about not having tried drugs or alcohol. Unless an actual medical examination suggets lack of drugs and alcohol in one’s system, it is not prudent to believe everything that one says. Also, the survey results focus more on the students who eat a meal with their parents, than the ones who do not. What percentage of adolescents who do not eat with their families, have good grades in school and do not engage in drugs/ alcohol consumption? We need answers to that as well. Unless, a full 360 degree view of this survey is provided, it would not be smart to derive a conclusion. Lastly, is it possible that the advantages that the author has listed are actually a result of some other factors, and do not have much to do with merely eating meals with the family? Consider the example, of a teenager, who lives with his single parent, and his parent works two jobs to put food on a table, for this child, eating a meal with his parent is not possible, but the reasons he is not able to score well in exams, is not because he is not eating a meal with his parent, but because of other personal/financial issues. Or, consider the case of another student, he works part-time jobs to assist his family financially and thus cannot make time to eat meals with his family, his anxiety and low grades are due to financial reasons and has nothing to do with his family’s eating habits. Hence, in order to substantiate his claim, the author must find out more background information of the teenagers questioned, and understand wether an alternate underlying relationship exists that relates to dwindling grades and poor performance at school. In conclusion, the author’s claim relies on several unjustified assumptions and in order to reach to a solution, the above questions must be answered.
In the newsletter publication, the
author
recommends
families
of adolescents to
eat
their
meals
together, in
order
to turn troubled teens away from
bad
behaviors. The
author
reached this
conclusion
based on a study, where 30% of over 5000 adolescents claimed that they
eat
meals
with their
families
, and these teens
were observed
to be
less
likely to try
drugs
and
alcohol
. The
author
also
extrapolates from the
conclusions
of this study, that these teens are
also
less
likely to have low
grades
in
school
, low
self esteem
and depression. While the
author
suggestion appears sound, it relies on several unwarranted assumptions. In
order
to reach a
conclusion
, three questions
must
be answered
.

Firstly
, can
results
from a study, in Appleton
School
district
,
be applied
to
other
districts/ states? Or in
other
words, are all regions homogenous,
so
as the observations from one
district
can
be assumed
to
also
lead to same
conclusions
in
other
places? It is
possible
that Appleton
District
is a
very
religious
district
and
hence
, most
teenages
, irrespective of
wether
they
eat
meals
with their
families
, are
less
likely to try
drugs
and
alcohol
.
Also
, it is
possible
that, this same
district
has
relatively
easier
school
curriculum and
hence
less
students suffer from anxiety, and
get
better scores. If any of the above is true, then the
author’s
recommendation that
eating
meals
with
family
will lead to
less
depression and better
school
grades
, does not stand water.

Secondly
, how do we know that the
teenagers
did not lie on the survey? It is
possible
that the kids
were scared
of their teachers and
parents
, and
hence
lied about not having tried
drugs
or
alcohol
. Unless an actual medical examination
suggets
lack of
drugs
and
alcohol
in one’s system, it is not prudent to believe everything that one says.
Also
, the survey results focus more on the students
who
eat
a
meal
with their
parents
, than the
ones
who
do not. What percentage of adolescents
who
do not
eat
with their
families
, have
good
grades
in
school
and do not engage in drugs/
alcohol
consumption? We need answers to that
as well
. Unless, a full 360 degree view of this survey
is provided
, it would not be smart to derive a conclusion.

Lastly
, is it
possible
that the advantages that the
author
has listed are actually a result of
some
other
factors, and do not have much to do with
merely
eating
meals
with the
family
? Consider the example, of a
teenager
,
who
lives
with his single
parent
, and his
parent
works two jobs to put food on a table, for this child,
eating
a
meal
with his
parent
is not
possible
,
but
the reasons he is not able to score well in exams, is not
because
he is not
eating
a
meal
with his
parent
,
but
because
of
other
personal/financial issues. Or, consider the case of another student, he works part-time jobs to assist his
family
financially
and
thus
cannot
make
time to
eat
meals
with his
family
, his anxiety and low
grades
are due to financial reasons and has nothing to do with his
family’s
eating
habits.
Hence
, in
order
to substantiate his claim, the
author
must
find out more background information of the
teenagers
questioned, and understand
wether
an alternate underlying relationship exists that relates to dwindling
grades
and poor performance at school.

In
conclusion
, the
author’s
claim relies on several unjustified assumptions and in
order
to reach to a solution, the above questions
must
be answered
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS letter The following appeared in a newsletter published by the Appleton school district In a recent study more than 5 000 adolescents were asked how often they ate meals with their families Almost 30 percent of the teens said they ate at least seven meals per we

Letter
  American English
5 paragraphs
583 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: