Hiking petroleum prices are considered to be the most suitable remedial measure for growing environmental pollution. I disagree with this statement and consider that although, an increase in the asking petroleum prices may have some impact on environmental pollution, other solutions like zero emission vehicles and encouraging public transportation are of vital importance.
It seems reasonable to think that an increase in the fuel price will presumably cut down the atmospheric pollution which is increasing by leaps and bounds. As the fuel prices will rise, it will discourage people from using their personal vehicles. Thus, lesser cars on the roads will decrease their harmful gaseous emissions, which are deemed to be one of the main reasons for the environmental pollution. Certainly, this solution would help in reducing the air pollution but it is limited because it will make all transport expensive including the public transports. Moreover, the increased transportation charges will make the prices of other commodities go up and result in inflation. As a result, the money saved through increasing the petroleum prices would be consumed, many times over, in giving rebates.
One of the most effective remedy in combating the atmospheric pollution would be to introduce electric cars that have zero emissions. Since these cars run on electricity rather than consuming fossil fuels, they do not emit toxic fumes or smoke particles that result in air pollution. For example, Tesla car is an electric vehicle that is much popular in the developed world. This will not only bring instant results, but would also prove to be a more durable solution. There is, however, a need that governments in the developing countries should encourage these industries by giving subsidies and tax relaxations.
Another important measure to the growing atmospheric pollution is to make public transport more viable. By making these facilities more attractive and user friendly, the public can be prevented from using their own vehicles. This will indirectly lower the number of vehicles on the roads that would result in the lesser smoke and harmful gases being released into the atmosphere. Furthermore, constructing projects like underground trams and cross city electric rails will also help in combating the air pollution in the long run.
In conclusion, I believe that an increase in the petrol price is a limited solution to the growing environmental pollution. This problem can be addressed more efficiently by increasing the use of the electric cars and by promoting the public transport.
Hiking petroleum
prices
are considered
to be the most suitable remedial measure for growing
environmental
pollution
. I disagree with this statement and consider that although, an increase in the asking petroleum
prices
may have
some
impact on
environmental
pollution
, other
solutions
like zero emission
vehicles
and encouraging
public
transportation are of vital importance.
It seems reasonable to
think
that an increase in the fuel
price
will presumably
cut
down the atmospheric
pollution
which is increasing by leaps and bounds. As the fuel
prices
will rise, it will discourage
people
from using their personal
vehicles
.
Thus
, lesser
cars
on the roads will decrease their harmful gaseous emissions, which
are deemed
to be one of the main reasons for the
environmental
pollution
.
Certainly
, this
solution
would
help
in reducing the air
pollution
but
it
is limited
because
it will
make
all
transport
expensive including the
public
transports
.
Moreover
, the increased transportation charges will
make
the
prices
of other commodities go up and
result
in inflation. As a
result
, the money saved through increasing the petroleum
prices
would
be consumed
,
many
times over, in giving rebates.
One of the most effective remedy in combating the atmospheric
pollution
would be to introduce
electric
cars
that have zero emissions. Since these
cars
run on electricity
rather
than consuming fossil fuels, they do not emit toxic fumes or smoke particles that
result
in air
pollution
.
For example
, Tesla
car
is an
electric
vehicle
that is
much popular in the developed world. This will not
only
bring instant
results
,
but
would
also
prove to be a more durable
solution
. There is,
however
, a need that
governments
in the
developing countries
should encourage these industries by giving subsidies and tax relaxations.
Another
important
measure to the growing atmospheric
pollution
is to
make
public
transport
more viable. By making these facilities more attractive and
user friendly
, the
public
can be
prevented
from using their
own
vehicles
. This will
indirectly
lower the number of
vehicles
on the roads that would
result
in the lesser smoke and harmful gases
being released
into the atmosphere.
Furthermore
, constructing projects like underground trams and cross city
electric
rails will
also
help
in combating the air
pollution
in the long run.
In conclusion
, I believe that an increase in the petrol
price
is a limited
solution
to the growing
environmental
pollution
. This problem can
be addressed
more
efficiently
by increasing the
use
of the
electric
cars
and by promoting the
public
transport
.