Whether a single-sex or a uni-sex university is more advantageous and yields better results is open for debate. Single-sex schools are preferred by many since they believe that it ensures a better environment for education while the proponents of coeducation argue that boys and girls should be taught together for a healthy competition and better mutual understanding. Personally, I prefer the single-sex institute method.
The advocates of the mixed-education system often point out that when boys and girls study in the same institution, they grow a mutual understanding. As a result, it will ensure a wholesome work environment in the future. Moreover, this education system encourages a healthy competitive and helps students excel not only in their studies but also in other important areas. For instance, when boys and girls are assigned to a project, they tend to learn how to work together. Reversely, they often compete to show their supremacy and thus excel in education and learning. But this is not the whole picture.
As a female, and as a student in both coeducational and separate schools, I must outline that I felt more comfortable being with girls than boys. In a perfect world, the mixed-sex schools may produce far-reaching benefits, but not in a world where we are often shattered by the harsh reality. Single-sex schools have less violence, sexual discrimination and abuse. Bringing very young boys and girls together in schools has consequences that often lead to social degradation.
To conclude, despite some advantages, coeducation has severe problems. From my experience, I can say that a separate educational system is healthy, free of discrimination and abuse. I hope that parents would be very thoughtful before deciding to send their children to a particular academy type.
Whether a single-sex or a uni-sex university is more advantageous and yields better results is open for debate. Single-sex
schools
are preferred
by
many
since they believe that it ensures a better environment for education while the proponents of coeducation argue that
boys
and
girls
should
be taught
together for a healthy competition and better mutual understanding.
Personally
, I prefer the single-sex institute method.
The advocates of the mixed-education system
often
point out that when
boys
and
girls
study in the same institution, they grow a mutual understanding.
As a result
, it will ensure a wholesome work environment in the future.
Moreover
, this education system encourages a healthy competitive and
helps
students excel not
only
in their studies
but
also
in other
important
areas.
For instance
, when
boys
and
girls
are assigned
to a project, they tend to learn how to work together.
Reversely
, they
often
compete to
show
their supremacy and
thus
excel in education and learning.
But
this is not the whole picture.
As a female, and as a student in both coeducational and separate
schools
, I
must
outline that I felt more comfortable being with
girls
than
boys
. In a perfect world, the mixed-sex
schools
may produce far-reaching benefits,
but
not in a world where we are
often
shattered by the harsh reality. Single-sex
schools
have less violence, sexual discrimination and abuse. Bringing
very
young
boys
and
girls
together in
schools
has consequences that
often
lead to social degradation.
To conclude
, despite
some
advantages, coeducation has severe problems. From my experience, I can say that a separate educational system is healthy, free of discrimination and abuse. I hope that parents would be
very
thoughtful
before
deciding to
send
their children to a particular academy type.