Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

You are a regular customer at a supermarket in your town/city. You have recently noticed a problem with some of the products that you usually buy and you have decided to complain about this. Write a letter to the manager. In your letterExplain who you areD v.1

You are a regular customer at a supermarket in your town/city. You have recently noticed a problem with some of the products that you usually buy and you have decided to complain about this. Write a letter to the manager. In your letterExplain who you areD v. 1
Telecasting court proceedings to the citizens of the country is a common practice followed by several nations presently, allowing them to access the procedure and progress of cases. While some people argue that it is beneficial to the country, others believe it to be disadvantageous. This essay will discuss both the views in forthcoming paragraphs. Those who favour this trend, claims that it allows greater transparency of the judiciary, reposing the faith of the public at large in the justice system and thereby, promoting a greater adherence of laws in an effective manner. For instance, the supreme court of India allowed live updates in the famous land dispute case of Ayodhya, which allowed a swift acceptance of the verdict between concerned classes of society. Displaying such content on television helps in disseminating the correct information regarding the course of action being followed by judges, which leaves no scope for misinterpretation and helps in avoiding unnecessary controversies in cases where public interest is involved. For example, showing the facts related to the size of the panel, evidences found and testimonies of eye witnesses can gain greater support of media on important verdicts. Nonetheless, every coin has two sides. Revealing the sensitive information related to hearings can result in dire consequences such as tampering with the evidences and threats to the eyewitnesses. Further, it requires extra preparations on the part of the courts, which, if not dealt with diligently, may disturb the ongoing arguments, leading to wastage of valuable time of the courts. However, these aspects can be taken care of by employing professional personnel who are experienced in dealing with public affairs. Probing into the above discussion leads us to conclude that streaming of trials to the population of the nation has numerous benefits that supersedes its drawbacks and hence will prove to be helpful in augmenting the judicial framework of countries.
Telecasting
court
proceedings to the citizens of the country is a common practice followed by several nations
presently
, allowing them to access the procedure and progress of cases. While
some
people
argue that it is beneficial to the country, others believe it to be disadvantageous. This essay will discuss both the views in forthcoming paragraphs.

Those who
favour
this trend, claims that it
allows
greater transparency of the judiciary, reposing the faith of the public at large in the justice system and thereby, promoting a greater adherence of laws
in an effective manner
.
For instance
, the supreme
court
of India
allowed
live
updates in the
famous
land dispute case of Ayodhya, which
allowed
a swift acceptance of the verdict between concerned classes of society.

Displaying such content on television
helps
in disseminating the correct information regarding the course of action
being followed
by judges, which
leaves
no scope for misinterpretation and
helps
in avoiding unnecessary controversies in cases where public interest
is involved
.
For example
, showing the facts related to the size of the panel, evidences found and testimonies of
eye witnesses
can gain greater support of media on
important
verdicts.

Nonetheless, every coin has two sides. Revealing the sensitive information related to hearings can result in dire consequences such as tampering with the evidences and threats to the eyewitnesses.
Further
, it requires extra preparations on the part of the
courts
, which, if not dealt with
diligently
, may disturb the ongoing arguments, leading to wastage of valuable time of the
courts
.
However
, these aspects can
be taken
care of by employing professional personnel who
are experienced
in dealing with public affairs.

Probing into the above discussion leads us
to conclude
that streaming of trials to the population of the nation has numerous benefits that supersedes its drawbacks and
hence
will prove to be helpful in augmenting the judicial framework of countries.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes

IELTS essay You are a regular customer at a supermarket in your town/city. You have recently noticed a problem with some of the products that you usually buy and you have decided to complain about this. Write a letter to the manager. In your letterExplain who you areD v. 1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
311 words
7.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts