Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

WRITING TASK 2. One world government is better than a national government. Do you agree or disagree?

WRITING TASK 2. One world government is better than a national government. xagR9
In the state-of-the-art society has been characterized by the free flow of information and commodity. The frequent interaction and growing interdependence among countries have ended the day of isolation and absolute national sovereignty, but they have also sparked off heated controversies over the global governmental system. A closed inspection of this daunting argument will reveal how fallacious it would be owing to countless irreversible repercussions. To open the deliberation, regarding the mutual administration ruling the world, it is irrefutable that there would be no restriction on immigration. Thus, a scenario which an inordinate number of inhabitants would flock to prosperous areas is just a sooner-or-latter issue. Hence, this can result in booming joblessness and housing problems. Simultaneously, Cosmocratic authorities might be directly proportional to tremendous diametrically opposing ideologies and moral criterions. This, from then on, would put an end to the fate of human-being since the all-encompassing constitution brings them into persistently social anarchy or even the outbreak of political and armed warfare. That is to say that the concept of cosmocracy might not make sense. On the flip side, being given the liberal democratic way of life, it is conceivable that town-folks in this twenty-first century would undermine the united governance revolution. The multination in the contemporary world is required to keep up with the fast-pace changing context in order to execute the competitiveness and global cooperation. A single centralized regime is prompted to come up with technology-oriented initiatives to stand the parallel space with others. Obviously, this might give a boost to the global socioeconomic status. On the contrary, the cohabitation would diminish the valid regional identities and they just seem similar in any large metropolis. In essence, though people may vary in their perspective, I am wholeheartedly convinced that various nation would be appealing for the long-sight proliferation picture. Hence, a wise series of management should be undertaken to tackle the current crisis to ensure the human progress.
In the state-of-the-art society has
been characterized
by the free flow of information and commodity. The frequent interaction and growing interdependence among countries have ended the day of isolation and absolute national sovereignty,
but
they have
also
sparked off heated controversies over the global governmental system. A closed inspection of this daunting argument will reveal how fallacious it would be owing to countless irreversible repercussions.

To open the deliberation, regarding the mutual administration ruling the world, it is irrefutable that there would be no restriction on immigration.
Thus
, a scenario which an inordinate number of inhabitants would flock to prosperous areas is
just
a sooner-or-latter issue.
Hence
, this can result in booming joblessness and housing problems.
Simultaneously
,
Cosmocratic
authorities might be
directly
proportional to tremendous
diametrically
opposing ideologies and moral criterions. This, from then on, would put an
end
to the fate of human-being since the all-encompassing constitution brings them into
persistently
social anarchy or even the outbreak of political and armed warfare.
That is
to say that the concept of
cosmocracy
might not
make
sense.

On the flip side, being
given
the liberal democratic way of life, it is conceivable that town-folks in this twenty-
first
century would undermine the united governance revolution. The multination in the contemporary world
is required
to
keep
up with the
fast
-pace changing context in order to execute the competitiveness and global cooperation. A single centralized regime
is prompted
to
come
up with technology-oriented initiatives to stand the parallel space with others.
Obviously
, this might give a boost to the global socioeconomic status.
On the contrary
, the cohabitation would diminish the valid regional
identities and
they
just
seem similar in any large metropolis.

In essence, though
people
may vary in their perspective, I am
wholeheartedly
convinced that various nation would be appealing for the long-sight proliferation picture.
Hence
, a wise series of management should be undertaken to tackle the
current
crisis to ensure the human progress.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay WRITING TASK 2. One world government is better than a national government.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
321 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: