In recent years the vast expansion of information and communications technology has made teleworking much more practical called telecommuting as well. Although in many cases, office staff could be made geographically independent by using modems, faxes and cell phones, few companies or employees take full advantage of this possibility There are a number of strong arguments in favor of allowing workers to work from home.
First, costs for employers would be reduced because businesses would require less office space, which is often situated in the center of large cities. Secondly, worker’s lives would be improved in a variety of ways. For example, they would not need to travel to get to work, which would give them more free time Also, they could combine their work with their family life, which is a major advantage if they are parents of young children or they have old people to look after.
Next, telecommuting is restructuring unban society. Employee would like to stay sub urban location. Shop and cultural events are being relocated out of the city Centre. Fewer cars on the road during peak hours, eventually a smaller concentration of officers in central business districts
On the other hand, traveling to a centralized workplace also has a number of points in its favor. The first is that many employees would miss the social aspect of work such as seeing colleagues and meeting customers. A further point is that employers would need to be able to trust their workers to work at a high standard and finish their work on time, since supervising teleworkers is even more complicated than supervising workers in the same office.
Finally, working from home might inhibit teamwork and creative work and so perhaps so only really suitable for people doing routine office work
In conclusion, I believe that while many workers welcome the opportunity to go out to work, others would find the chance to work from home very convenient.
In recent years the vast expansion of information and communications technology has made teleworking much more practical called telecommuting
as well
. Although in
many
cases, office staff could
be made
geographically
independent by using modems, faxes and cell phones, few
companies
or employees take full advantage of this possibility There are a number of strong arguments in favor of allowing
workers
to
work
from home.
First
, costs for employers would be
reduced
because
businesses would require less office space, which is
often
situated in the center of large cities.
Secondly
,
worker’s
lives
would be
improved
in a variety of ways.
For example
, they would not need to travel to
get
to
work
, which would give them more free time
Also
, they could combine their
work
with their family life, which is a major advantage if they are parents of young
children or
they have
old
people
to look after.
Next
, telecommuting is restructuring unban society. Employee would like to stay sub urban location. Shop and cultural
events
are
being relocated
out of the city
Centre
. Fewer cars on the road during peak hours,
eventually
a smaller concentration of officers in central business
districts
On the other hand
, traveling to a centralized workplace
also
has a number of points in its favor. The
first
is that
many
employees would miss the social aspect of
work
such as seeing colleagues and meeting customers. A
further
point is that employers would need to be able to trust their
workers
to
work
at a high standard and finish their
work
on time, since supervising teleworkers is even more complicated than supervising
workers
in the same office.
Finally
, working from home might inhibit teamwork and creative work and
so
perhaps
so
only
really
suitable for
people
doing routine office work
In conclusion
, I believe that while
many
workers
welcome the opportunity to go out to
work
, others would find the chance to
work
from home
very
convenient.