In this set of materials, the reading passage claims that the population of wild tuna has been decreased recently due to overfishing, and scientists state several criticisms about farming tuna. However, the lecturer asserts some promising solutions to address all concerns and explains her evidence.
First of all, it is mentioned in the passage that female tuna cannot lay eggs when they are in cages. In contrast, the professor points out that certain hormones help female tuna to reproduce efficiently, and researchers inject them directly to their bodies, while they do not cause any harm for fishes and consumer later. She believes that this breakthrough discovery can solve this problem, which prevents the population decline. Hence, female fishes still can produce more young tuna, even in captivity.
Furthermore, the author of the passage argues that tuna feed on high-protein food derived from other fish, which are costly for farmers. Conversely, the lecturer refutes the former notion and believes that unlike what was stated in the article, they can eat plants that are high in protein as well, and it is not necessary to exclusively consume small fishes to grow. Moreover, those specific plants are inexpensive and affordable, and farmers still have a profitable business. Therefore, farmers have an alternative way to reduce the cost of growing tuna.
Finally, the reading explains that tuna confined to ocean cages are susceptible to become infested with parasites. On the contrary, the professor states that farmers can move the cages to deeper parts of the ocean because blood flukes, a parasite that lives in the blood vessels, like to live close to shore and cannot survive in deeper zones. In fact, if farmers transfer tuna to safer areas, they can basically stop infestations of blood flukes and increase the population of alive tuna.
In this set of materials, the reading passage claims that the population of wild
tuna
has
been decreased
recently due to overfishing, and scientists state several criticisms about farming
tuna
.
However
, the lecturer asserts
some
promising solutions to address all concerns and
explains
her evidence.
First of all
, it
is mentioned
in the passage that female
tuna
cannot lay eggs when they are in cages.
In contrast
, the professor points out that certain hormones
help
female
tuna
to reproduce
efficiently
, and researchers inject them
directly
to their bodies, while they do not cause any harm for fishes and consumer later. She believes that this breakthrough discovery can solve this problem, which
prevents
the population decline.
Hence
, female fishes
still
can produce more young
tuna
, even in captivity.
Furthermore
, the author of the passage argues that
tuna
feed on high-protein food derived from other fish, which are costly for
farmers
.
Conversely
, the lecturer refutes the former notion and believes that unlike what
was stated
in the article, they can eat plants that are high in protein
as well
, and it is not necessary to exclusively consume
small
fishes to grow.
Moreover
, those specific plants are inexpensive and affordable, and
farmers
still
have a profitable business.
Therefore
,
farmers
have an alternative way to
reduce
the cost of growing tuna.
Finally
, the reading
explains
that
tuna
confined to ocean cages are susceptible to become infested with parasites.
On the contrary
, the professor states that
farmers
can
move
the cages to deeper parts of the ocean
because
blood flukes, a parasite that
lives
in the blood vessels, like to
live
close to shore and cannot survive in deeper zones. In fact, if
farmers
transfer
tuna
to safer areas, they can
basically
stop
infestations of blood flukes and increase the population of alive
tuna
.