In this set of materials, the reading passage explains three possible theories about the purpose of the Plain of Jars on an archaeological site. However, the lecturer believes that despite these theories, they are still mysterious, and scientists are uncertain about them. Then he provides some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, it is mentioned in the article that people used the jars for fermentation to celebrate special ceremonies such as a great victory. On the contrary, the lecturer asserts that clay pots also can serve this purpose while the Plain of Jars were made of stone. It was difficult, time-consuming, and expensive to make such a huge jar by a stone while clay jars were accessible. Hence, it is unconvincing that ancient people used them for such a purpose.
Furthermore, the author of the passage claims that another reasonable theory is that they have been used for water storage. In contrast, the professor points out that although jars were found near trade routes, there were also rivers and streams close to those routes. It shows that traveling traders did not need to have other sources of water when they could easily have access to freshwater nearby. In fact, it is impossible to keep water in large jars near rivers and streams.
Finally, the passage states that people may use them as tombs to place human remains. Conversely, the professor argues that even though some metal tools, jewelry, and glass beads have been found in some jars, nobody can assume they belong to dead people since researchers did not find any covers on or near jars. It was necessary to protect dead bodies from weather and animals, and without covering, it was impossible. Therefore, people did not use the jars as tombs.
In this set of materials, the reading passage
explains
three possible theories about the purpose of the Plain of
Jars
on an archaeological site.
However
, the lecturer believes that despite these theories, they are
still
mysterious, and scientists are uncertain about them. Then he provides
some
evidence to refute them all.
First of all
, it
is mentioned
in the article that
people
used
the
jars
for fermentation to celebrate special ceremonies such as a great victory.
On the contrary
, the lecturer asserts that clay pots
also
can serve this purpose while the Plain of
Jars
were
made of stone. It was difficult, time-consuming, and expensive to
make
such a huge
jar
by a stone while clay
jars
were accessible.
Hence
, it is unconvincing that ancient
people
used
them for such a purpose.
Furthermore
, the author of the passage claims that another reasonable theory is that they have been
used
for water storage.
In contrast
, the professor points out that although
jars
were found
near trade routes, there were
also
rivers and streams close to those routes. It
shows
that traveling traders did not need to have other sources of water when they could
easily
have access to freshwater nearby. In fact, it is impossible to
keep
water in large
jars
near rivers and streams.
Finally
, the passage states that
people
may
use
them as tombs to place human remains.
Conversely
, the professor argues that
even though
some
metal tools, jewelry, and glass beads have
been found
in
some
jars
, nobody can assume they belong to dead
people
since researchers did not find any covers on or near
jars
. It was necessary to protect dead bodies from weather and animals, and without covering, it was impossible.
Therefore
,
people
did not
use
the
jars
as tombs.