It is believed by some that developed countries should provide humanitarian aid to underdeveloped countries during natural catastrophes. This essay strongly agrees with this assertion because ticher countries alone have the resources to do so and it s a moral Imperative.
Developed nations are financially prosperous, so they have the unique ability to immediately help others in crisis As their economies are robust, they can provide the types of aid for countries in crisis that no one else can. This aid can come in many forms, whether it be emergency health care ane provisions, or even various types of transport which poorer nations are generally shortage of For example, following the monsoon floods in Bangladesh, many nations helped by providing temporary shelters. shipping untold omounts of tood, and even looning helicopters for the evacuation, none of which could have been adequately provided by poorer countries
The second reason why rich nations should help less fortunate ones is that it is the right thing to da. From birth, we are al taught that we should love our fellow man and help each other when we are in need. Being rich does not exempt aneself from this moral imperative, Rather, It makes it essential, as it people cannot find it in themselves to share their ample resources with people suffering in other countries, their values will erode at home. For example. Barack Obama once sold that if Americans could justify turning their backs on poople who were suffering abroad, would then become easier for Americans to start turning their backs on each other
In conclusion, this essay affirms that wealthy countries should assist poorer ones in times of need because they have the resources to do so and it is the morally right thing to do
It
is believed
by
some
that developed
countries
should provide humanitarian aid to underdeveloped
countries
during natural catastrophes. This essay
strongly
agrees
with this assertion
because
ticher
countries
alone have the resources to do
so
and
it s
a moral Imperative.
Developed
nations
are
financially
prosperous,
so
they have the unique ability to immediately
help
others in crisis As their economies are robust, they can provide the types of aid for
countries
in crisis that no one else can. This aid can
come
in
many
forms, whether it be emergency health care
ane
provisions, or even various types of transport which poorer
nations
are
generally
shortage of
For example
, following the monsoon floods in Bangladesh,
many
nations
helped
by providing temporary shelters.
shipping
untold
omounts
of
tood
, and even
looning
helicopters for the evacuation, none of which could have been
adequately
provided by poorer
countries
The second reason why rich
nations
should
help
less fortunate
ones
is that it is the right thing to
da
. From birth, we are
al
taught that we should
love
our fellow
man
and
help
each other when we are in need. Being rich does not exempt
aneself
from this moral imperative,
Rather
, It
makes
it essential, as it
people
cannot find it in themselves to share their ample resources with
people
suffering in other
countries
, their values will erode at home.
For example
. Barack Obama once sold that if Americans could justify turning their backs on
poople
who were suffering abroad, would then become easier for Americans to
start
turning their backs on each
other
In conclusion
, this essay affirms that wealthy
countries
should assist poorer
ones
in times of need
because
they have the resources to do
so
and it is the
morally
right thing to do