It is believed by some that developed countries should provide humanitarian aid to underdeveloped countries during natural catastrophes. This essay strongly agrees with this assertion because ticher countries alone have the resources to do so and it s a moral Imperative.
Developed nations are financially prosperous, so they have the unique ability to immediately help others in crisis As their economies are robust, they can provide the types of aid for countries in crisis that no one else can. This aid can come in many forms, whether it be emergency health care ane provisions, or even various types of transport which poorer nations are generally shortage of For example, following the monsoon floods in Bangladesh, many nations helped by providing temporary shelters. shipping untold omounts of tood, and even looning helicopters for the evacuation, none of which could have been adequately provided by poorer countries
The second reason why rich nations should help less fortunate ones is that it is the right thing to da. From birth, we are al taught that we should love our fellow man and help each other when we are in need. Being rich does not exempt aneself from this moral imperative, Rather, It makes it essential, as it people cannot find it in themselves to share their ample resources with people suffering in other countries, their values will erode at home. For example. Barack Obama once sold that if Americans could justify turning their backs on poople who were suffering abroad, would then become easier for Americans to start turning their backs on each other
In conclusion, this essay affirms that wealthy countries should assist poorer ones in times of need because they have the resources to do so and it is the morally right thing to do
It  
is believed
 by  
some
 that developed  
countries
 should provide humanitarian aid to underdeveloped  
countries
 during natural catastrophes. This essay  
strongly
  agrees
 with this assertion  
because
  ticher
  countries
 alone have the resources to do  
so
 and  
it s
 a moral Imperative.
Developed  
nations
 are  
financially
 prosperous,  
so
 they have the unique ability to immediately  
help
 others in crisis As their economies are robust, they can provide the types of aid for  
countries
 in crisis that no one else can. This aid can  
come
 in  
many
 forms, whether it be emergency health care  
ane
 provisions, or even various types of transport which poorer  
nations
 are  
generally
 shortage of  
For example
, following the monsoon floods in Bangladesh,  
many
  nations
  helped
 by providing temporary shelters.  
shipping
 untold  
omounts
 of  
tood
, and even  
looning
 helicopters for the evacuation, none of which could have been  
adequately
 provided by poorer  
countries
The second reason why rich  
nations
 should  
help
 less fortunate  
ones
 is that it is the right thing to  
da
. From birth, we are  
al
 taught that we should  
love
 our fellow  
man
 and  
help
 each other when we are in need. Being rich does not exempt  
aneself
 from this moral imperative,  
Rather
, It  
makes
 it essential, as it  
people
 cannot find it in themselves to share their ample resources with  
people
 suffering in other  
countries
, their values will erode at home.  
For example
. Barack Obama once sold that if Americans could justify turning their backs on  
poople
 who were suffering abroad, would then become easier for Americans to  
start
 turning their backs on each  
other
 In conclusion
, this essay affirms that wealthy  
countries
 should assist poorer  
ones
 in times of need  
because
 they have the resources to do  
so
 and it is the  
morally
 right thing to do