“It is difficult to find the main arguments in this answer. There are long, formulaic introductions, not many ideas that deal with the actual issues and the writer's point of view is not consistent. The prompt is copied directly three times in the response and the remainder is underlength at 1 fit. words, so marks are lost for this.
The response is organised into sections, but the relationship between ideas is not always clear and the linking expressions are sometimes inaccurate, as in the opening paragraph, or used in a mechanical way, as in the second paragraph.
The dependence on formulaic language and the input material indicates a limited range of vocabulary and there is a lot of repetition and inaccuracy. A range of structures is attempted, but control is weak. Errors in grammar and punctuation are frequent and cause problems for the reader.
“It is difficult to find the main arguments in this answer. There are long, formulaic introductions, not
many
ideas
that deal with the actual issues and the writer's point of view is not consistent. The prompt
is copied
directly
three times in the response and the remainder is
underlength
at 1 fit.
words
,
so
marks
are lost
for this.
The response is
organised
into sections,
but
the relationship between
ideas
is not always
clear
and the linking expressions are
sometimes
inaccurate, as in the opening paragraph, or
used
in a mechanical way
, as in the second paragraph.
The dependence on formulaic language and the input material indicates a limited range of vocabulary and there is
a lot of
repetition and inaccuracy. A range of structures
is attempted
,
but
control is weak. Errors in grammar and punctuation are frequent and cause problems for the reader.