Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Universities Should Accept Equal Number Of Male And Female Students In Each Subject v.1

Universities Should Accept Equal Number Of Male And Female Students In Each Subject v. 1
According to some people, the number of boys and girls admitted to any course should be the same. In other words half of the seats should be reserved for male candidates and half should be reserved for female candidates. I do not agree with this view. In my opinion, merit, and not gender, should be the criterion for admission into university programmes. The argument that Having the same number of men and women on all degree courses is simply unrealistic. To start with, it shows utter disregard for merit. If seats are reserved on the basis of gender, many meritorious students will fail to get admission. Universities should select best students that are qualified enough for the subject based on their talent and performances, not on their sex. Therefore, both men and women can have opportunities to achieve their goals as they know that their success in school is based on good performances. Another argument against reserving seats on the basis of gender is the difference in the aptitude of men and women. Certain courses like nursing, home science or teaching are more popular among the girls. Likewise, certain courses like engineering and mechanics are more popular among boys. If half of the seats are reserved for boys in a nursing course, chances are many seats will lie vacant. At the same time, many meritorious girls will fail to get admission. Even in courses where both boys and girls have the same aptitude, this arrangement will prevent many deserving candidates from gaining admission just because they belong to the other gender. In conclusion, university education is important for both male and female but admitting them in equal proportion is out of question practically as well as socially.
According to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
, the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
boys
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
girls
admitted to any
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
course
should be the same.
In other words
half of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
seats
should be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reserved
for male candidates and half should be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reserved
for female candidates. I do not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this view. In my opinion, merit, and not gender, should be the criterion for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
admission
into university
Possible spelling mistake. 'programmes' is British English.
programmes
.

The argument that Having the same number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
men
and women on all degree
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
courses
is
simply
unrealistic. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
with, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
utter disregard for merit. If
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
seats
are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reserved
on the basis of gender,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
meritorious students will fail to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
admission
. Universities should select best students that
are qualified
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
for the subject based on their talent and performances, not on their sex.
Therefore
, both
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
men
and women can have opportunities to achieve their goals as they know that their success in school
is based
on
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
performances.

Another argument against reserving
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
seats
on the basis of gender is the difference in the aptitude of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
men
and women. Certain
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
courses
like nursing, home science or teaching are more popular among the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
girls
.
Likewise
, certain
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
courses
like engineering and mechanics are more popular among
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
boys
. If half of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
seats
are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reserved
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
boys
in a nursing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
course
, chances are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
seats
will lie vacant. At the same time,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
meritorious
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
girls
will fail to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
admission
. Even in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
courses
where both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
boys
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
girls
have the same aptitude, this arrangement will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
deserving candidates from gaining
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
admission
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they belong to the other gender.

In conclusion
, university education is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
for both male and female
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
admitting them in equal proportion is out of question
practically
as well
as
socially
.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
27Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS essay Universities Should Accept Equal Number Of Male And Female Students In Each Subject v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
287 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts