The plotted line, comparatively, illustrates unqualified people condition in the year 2012.
According to the pictorial representation, in the rural areas the first quarters which is 6. 5 %, and it was dropped in the second quarters of the year which is 4. 5%, and agin it rose in the third year and it is underwent fluctuations and reaching 5%.
in the same way in the urban areas the starting it is 2%, it is slowly increasing in the second quarter it is 4% and some fluctuations reached 4%
it is clearly evident from the given figure, that at the beginning of the period rural areas was the highest unemployment rate in comparison the urban areas least significant unqualified people. At the end of thee period both were reaching at the same percentage of employment and also the rural areas always highest in unployement condition and urban areas is the least in the un qualified people so most people educated in urban areas.
The plotted line,
comparatively
, illustrates unqualified
people
condition in the year 2012.
According to the pictorial representation, in the rural
areas
the
first
quarters which is 6. 5 %, and it
was dropped
in the second quarters of the year which is 4. 5%, and
agin
it rose in the third year and it is underwent fluctuations and reaching 5%.
in
the same way in the
urban
areas
the starting it is 2%, it is
slowly
increasing in the second quarter it is 4% and
some
fluctuations reached 4%
it
is
clearly
evident from the
given
figure, that at the beginning of the period rural
areas
was the highest unemployment rate
in comparison
the
urban
areas
least significant unqualified
people
. At the
end
of thee period both were reaching at the same percentage of employment and
also
the rural
areas
always highest in
unployement
condition and
urban
areas
is the least in the
un
qualified
people
so
most
people
educated in
urban
areas
.