Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practise should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

In British and Australian laws jury protects the person who is being accused of the crime due to lack of his past record. Some lawyers have suggested that this method should be changed. I personally agree with this statement as jury should be given all the past facts before announce their decision about the crime. Firstly, We all know that human learn from their past. It helps to improve their future. In British and Australia jury judge the crimnal without knowing their past. All criminals are not same. Sometimes wrong judgement aggravate the problem. When jury take decision without any understanding and announce the puishment to the criminal who are not felony. Those criminals suffers lot of violence. People get aggravate and infringement. Generally On the other hand, Some people do crime according to their situation. For example if a person going anywhere with their family or kids and someone surmount him. That time he has to face a teething trouble situation and he can be a murder. In this condition he takes action only in self defence. But jury judge and give punishment without any past information. Generally without past information some criminal to go Scot frst. In culmination, this issue needs attention and I completely agree with the lawyers who have suggested that it should be changed and it is mandatory for jury that they should be given all past facts before they judge about the case.
In British and Australian laws
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
protects the person who is
being accused
of the crime due to lack of his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
record.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
lawyers have suggested that this method should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changed
. I
personally
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this statement as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
all the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
facts
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
announce their decision about the crime.

Firstly
, We all know
The verb ‘learn’ is plural. Did you mean: “that human learns”? Did you use a verb instead of a noun?
that human learn
from their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
. It
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
their future. In British and Australia
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
judge the
Possible spelling mistake found.
crimnal
without knowing their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
. All
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminals
are not same.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Sometimes
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
judgement aggravate the problem. When
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
take decision without any understanding and announce the
Possible spelling mistake found.
puishment
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
who are not felony. Those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminals
You should probably use “suffer”.
suffers
lot of violence.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
aggravate and infringement.
Generally


On the other hand
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
do crime according to their situation.
For example
if a person going anywhere with their family or kids and someone
The pronoun ‘someone’ is usually used with a third-person or a past tense verb: “surmounts”, “surmounted”.
surmount
him. That time he
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
has to
face a teething trouble
Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
situation and
he can be a murder. In this condition he takes action
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
in
This word is normally spelled with a hyphen.
self defence
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
judge and give punishment without any
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
information.
Generally
without
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
information
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
criminal
to go Scot
Possible spelling mistake found.
frst
.

In culmination, this issue needs attention and I completely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the lawyers who have suggested that it should be
Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
changed and
it is mandatory for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jury
that they should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
past
facts
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
they judge about the case.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practise should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
239 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts