Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. oWR9
With the rise of urbanization and technology development, whether to give jury in a criminal case with information about defendant's past criminal record has become the subject of heated debate. There can be many positive and negative sides of all the facts that must be given to jury while judgement. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing both sides of this argument with my experience till now before deducing a proper conclusion. Beforehand, it can be said that are many benefits in providing complete record of lawbreaker to judges for example help them to analyze level of his past criminal cases and the case for which they are going to provide judgement. There may be case that offender has done some less violation as compared to present one which will help judges to give better decision and can query more better about his current misdeed, what made him to do this violation, what are was the reason etc. On the other hand, those who argue that the jury should not provide with past records of culprit have different perspective. They may consider that the judgment for crime done by offender should be based on the crime he has done rather than his past records. To sum up, what has been discussed above, it is my opinion that judges must provide with the past record of offender before giving any decision of his crime. However, there will undoubtedly will some negative consequences of this approach like judging culprit based on this past record rather than present.
With the rise of urbanization and technology development, whether to give jury in a criminal case with information about defendant's
past
criminal
record
has become the subject of heated debate. There can be
many
positive
and
negative
sides of all the facts that
must
be
given
to jury while judgement. In this essay, I shall
explain
my point of view by analyzing both sides of this argument with my experience till
now
before
deducing a proper conclusion.

Beforehand, it can
be said
that are
many
benefits in providing complete
record
of lawbreaker to judges
for example
help
them to analyze level of his
past
criminal cases and the case for which they are going to provide judgement. There may be case that offender has done
some
less violation as compared to present one which will
help
judges to give better decision and can query
more better
about his
current
misdeed, what made him to do this violation, what are
was
the reason etc.

On the other hand
, those who argue that the jury should not provide with
past
records
of culprit have
different
perspective. They may consider that the
judgment
for crime done by offender should
be based
on the crime he has done
rather
than his
past
records.

To sum up, what has
been discussed
above, it is my opinion that judges
must
provide with the
past
record
of offender
before
giving any decision of his crime.
However
, there will
undoubtedly
will
some
negative
consequences of this approach like judging culprit based on this
past
record
rather
than present.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
260 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts