Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is an undeniable fact that life is unimaginable without people. In fact, rules and regulation are omnipresent which are indispensable. A few section of the society opine that access should be given for the past criminal record to a jury. However, I differ from them and opine that all records should be maintained confidentially. Thus, I firmly disagree with the presented statement. I elucidate my stand in the following paragraph The first and predominent reason for not supporting the concept of sharing the past criminal records is that accused who might committed a crime in the past will definitely not commit anything against rules. In other words, a person indulged in the criminal activities such as robbery, chain snatching, and drug trafficking was finally incarcerated for 10 years. After releasing from the rehabilitation center, the same person will be arrested for any suspicious activity. To exemplify this point, we can consider the judgement happended last year that is, the accused person had been released by the court because of his innocent behaviour eventhough he was filed as a criminal. If his past criminal record was reviewed by a jury then his life will be in a jeopardy Furthermore, one more convincing point that cannot be ignore is that, people works against the government in order to help their family members and friends. To justify, I would quote an example of a criminal released from the prison because upon close examination, he did the crime in order to save his friends from the contagious disease which is an evident proof if this phenomenon. So, the past life of the criminal should not digged out and maintain stringent procedure for his first information report copy. In conclusion, I recapitulate that there are innumerable strong arguments supporting not to grant access to a jury for the past criminal files. Hence, I firmly disagree with the presented statement
It is an undeniable fact that life is unimaginable without
people
. In fact,
rules
and regulation are omnipresent which are indispensable. A
few section
of the society opine that access should be
given
for the
past
criminal
record
to a jury.
However
, I differ from them and opine that all
records
should
be maintained
confidentially
.
Thus
, I
firmly
disagree with the presented statement. I elucidate my stand in the following
paragraph


The
first
and
predominent
reason for not supporting the concept of sharing the
past
criminal
records
is that accused who might committed a crime in the
past
will definitely not commit anything against
rules
.
In other words
, a person indulged in the
criminal
activities such as robbery, chain snatching, and drug trafficking was
finally
incarcerated for 10 years. After releasing from the rehabilitation center, the same person will
be arrested
for any suspicious activity. To exemplify this point, we can consider the judgement
happended
last year
that is
, the accused person had
been released
by the court
because
of his innocent
behaviour
eventhough
he
was filed
as a
criminal
. If his
past
criminal
record
was reviewed
by a jury then his life will be in a
jeopardy


Furthermore
, one more convincing point that cannot be
ignore
is that,
people
works
against the
government
in order to
help
their family members and friends. To justify, I would quote an example of a
criminal
released from the prison
because
upon close examination, he did the crime in order to save his friends from the contagious disease which is an evident proof if this phenomenon.
So
, the
past
life of the
criminal
should not
digged
out and maintain stringent procedure for his
first
information report copy.

In conclusion
, I recapitulate that there are innumerable strong arguments supporting not to grant access to a jury for the
past
criminal
files.
Hence
, I
firmly
disagree with the presented statement
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
314 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts