Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Do copyright laws limit creativity or reward it? Would society function better without such rules and regulations?

It is supposed by many that copyright laws may be counterproductive and could hinder creative endeavour; however, personally, I disagree with this idea and opine strongly that the protection of intellectual property is crucial to a well-functioning society, and, in fact, encourages the production of further works by providing a framework within which innovators may be adequately rewarded for their efforts. Copyright regulations may prevent people from expanding on existing ideas, but a key purpose of such rules is to ensure that new ideas are sufficiently original to warrant financial reward. It is unlikely that members of the public could discern an original piece from a fraud, and so the support of the courts is necessary in order to uphold standards of originality. The US federal government states, for instance, that such laws exist to stimulate artistic creativity for the general public good, and to ensure reasonable return to authors and inventors. Through this process, the law establishes incentives for producing new works, which in turn encourages learning, progress, and development. Without such regulations, individuals would be free to copy another’s work. As mentioned above, the general public cannot reasonably be expected to defend authenticity, and so would-be fraudsters may receive a financial reward comparable to that of the originator. Resultantly, in countries with substandard protections for artists, for example, creative output is consistently and considerably lower than that of nations with strong intellectual property regulations since the genuine owner of the work is afforded little protection or reward. If we accept that more creative output is good for society, then copyright law can be taken as the same. To conclude, copyright regulations are an essential tool for the promotion of creativity, and society tends to function better with their enforcement.
It
is supposed
by
many
that copyright
laws
may be counterproductive and could hinder creative
endeavour
;
however
,
personally
, I disagree with this
idea
and opine
strongly
that the protection of intellectual property is crucial to a well-functioning society, and, in fact, encourages the production of
further
works by providing a framework within which innovators may be
adequately
rewarded for their efforts.

Copyright
regulations
may
prevent
people
from expanding on existing
ideas
,
but
a key purpose of such
rules
is to ensure that new
ideas
are
sufficiently
original to warrant financial reward. It is unlikely that members of the public could discern an original piece from a fraud, and
so
the support of the courts is necessary in order to uphold standards of originality. The US federal
government
states,
for instance
, that such
laws
exist to stimulate artistic creativity for the
general public
good
, and to ensure reasonable return to authors and inventors. Through this process, the
law
establishes incentives for producing new works, which in turn encourages learning, progress, and development.

Without such
regulations
, individuals would be free to copy another’s
work
. As mentioned above, the
general public
cannot
reasonably
be
expected
to defend authenticity, and
so
would-be fraudsters may receive a financial reward comparable to that of the originator.
Resultantly
, in countries with substandard protections for artists,
for example
, creative output is
consistently
and
considerably
lower than that of nations with strong intellectual property
regulations
since the genuine owner of the
work
is afforded
little
protection or reward. If we accept that more creative output is
good
for society, then copyright
law
can
be taken
as the same.

To conclude
, copyright
regulations
are an essential tool for the promotion of creativity, and society tends to function better with their enforcement.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Do copyright laws limit creativity or reward it? Would society function better without such rules and regulations?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
291 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts