Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Types of air purifiers

Types of air purifiers 3agxN

The reading passage and lecture both have conflicting opinions about whether air purifiers are efficient or not. The author of the reading strongly postulates that there are so many types of air purifiers, which can be used to protect human health from air pollution. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that air filters are not as effective as mentioned in the passage and cast doubts on each of the claims made by the author. First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, HEPA filters remove allergens without producing pollution. Nonetheless, the lecture offsets these points by declaring that HEPA filters are not really effective in removing harmful pollutants which are really very small. In other words, they are too tiny and can easily escape into the environment. Next, the author contends that ozone-generating air purifies can get rid of any unusual smell and airborne chemicals. In contrast, the lecturer refutes this argument. He clears out that ozone-generating air purifiers are not that helpful. It basically has a high concentration to remove bad smell and chemicals, which can cause lung damage. And these chemicals have the same effect as toxic materials. The article lastly points out that UV air purifiers remove harmful bacteria from the air. Nevertheless, the speaker in the listening counters these indications by insisting that UV purifiers do not clear away harmful materials in the air. Moreover, basic materials like cigarettes, harmful gases, and other fumes can be removed away by humans.

The reading passage and lecture both have conflicting opinions about whether You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathbreezewind
air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcleanserdisinfectant
purifiers
 are efficient or not. The author of the reading strongly
 postulates that there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 types of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathbreezewind
air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcleanserdisinfectant
purifiers
, which can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to protect human health from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathbreezewind
air
 pollution. On the other hand
, the listening adamantly
 delineates that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathbreezewind
air
 filters are not as effective as mentioned in the passage and cast doubts on each of the claims made by the author.

First
 and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, HEPA filters remove allergens without producing pollution. Nonetheless, the lecture offsets these points by declaring that HEPA filters are not really
 effective in removing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinimicalunhealthynoxiouscatastrophicunsafepernicious
harmful
 pollutants which are really
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
. In other words
, they are too tiny and can easily
 escape into the environment.

Next
, the author contends that ozone-generating You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathbreezewind
air
 purifies can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 rid of any unusual smell and airborne chemicals. In contrast
, the lecturer refutes this argument. He clears out that ozone-generating You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathbreezewind
air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcleanserdisinfectant
purifiers
 are not that helpful. It basically
 has a high concentration to remove This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evil
bad
 smell and chemicals, which can cause lung damage. And these chemicals have the same effect as toxic materials.

The article lastly
 points out that UV You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathbreezewind
air
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcleanserdisinfectant
purifiers
 remove You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinimicalunhealthynoxiouscatastrophicunsafepernicious
harmful
 bacteria from the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathbreezewind
air
. Nevertheless
, the speaker in the listening counters these indications by insisting that UV You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcleanserdisinfectant
purifiers
 do not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 away You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinimicalunhealthynoxiouscatastrophicunsafepernicious
harmful
 materials in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbreathbreezewind
air
. Moreover
, basic materials like cigarettes, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinimicalunhealthynoxiouscatastrophicunsafepernicious
harmful
 gases, and other fumes can be removed
 away by humans. 