Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Tpo41: professor and passage challenge each others on how to rules on coal ash could beneficial

Tpo41: professor and passage challenge each others on how to rules on coal ash could beneficial jRQXX
In this set of materials, the reading and the lecture are both discussing coal ash wherein the reading states that the US government should regulate handling and storing coal ash, but the power companies have an opposite view. Moreover, the reading provides three arguments to support the power company’s position. However, the professor explains that the arguments presented by the author are unreliable and refutes each the author's points. First, the author of the reading claims that regulations already exist differently. Companies use a liner layer to prevent coal ash from pass through the soil. The professor refutes this point by explaining that this method is used in the new land, but what about the old land. He mentions that in the old land there are no liner layers, which they cause several damages in the drinking water. Secondly, the reading says that concrete and bricks that are from recycling coal ash will afraid the people. However, the professor says that people don not scare from recycling materials. Furthermore, he provides an example about Mercury, a hazard item, that people don not afraid of the Mercury recycling materials. In addition to that, they have bought this material form for many years. Finally, the reading states that new regulations will increase the power cost by increasing handling and storing coal ash. The professor opposes this point by saying that increasing the power cost will not too big. More than that, the range of the rising cost is only one percent. Therefore, every person can pay the bill for electricity. In conclusion, the three points that made in the lecture contrast with the reading. The first, second and third in the lecture demonstrate that arguments presented from power companies are in doubt.
In this set of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
materials
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
and the lecture are both discussing coal ash wherein the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
states that the US
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
should regulate handling and storing coal ash,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
have an opposite view.
Moreover
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
provides three arguments to support the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company’s
position.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explains
that the arguments presented by the author are unreliable and refutes each the author's points.

First
, the author of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
claims that regulations already exist
differently
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Companies
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
a liner layer to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
coal ash from pass through the soil. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
refutes this point by explaining that this method is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in the new land,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
what about the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
land. He mentions that in the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
land there are no liner layers, which they cause several damages in the drinking water.

Secondly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
says that concrete and bricks that are from recycling coal ash will afraid the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
says that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
Did you mean "do not"?
don not
scare from recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
materials
.
Furthermore
, he provides an example about Mercury, a hazard item, that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
Did you mean "do not"?
don not
afraid of the Mercury recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
materials
.
In addition
to that, they have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
material
form for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
years.

Finally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
states that new regulations will increase the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
cost by increasing handling and storing coal ash. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
opposes this point by saying that increasing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
cost will not too
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
. More than that, the range of the rising cost is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
one percent.
Therefore
, every person can pay the bill for electricity.

In conclusion
, the three points that made in the lecture contrast with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
. The
first
, second and third in the lecture demonstrate that arguments presented from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
are in doubt.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Tpo41: professor and passage challenge each others on how to rules on coal ash could beneficial

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
290 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Tpo41: professor and passage challenge each others on how to rules on coal ash could beneficial