Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The article states that if the employees are allowed to work 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week then there will significant benefits for the company, country and as well as the individual. The author provides three reasons of support of this. However,

The article states that if the employees are allowed to work 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week then there will significant benefits for the company, country and as well as the individual. The author provides three reasons of support of this. However, aw6yw
The article states that if the employees are allowed to work 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week then there will significant benefits for the company, country and as well as the individual. The author provides three reasons of support of this. However, the lecturer refutes all of the claims made by the article and thinks that it will be more harmful. First, the article states that if the employees work only 4 days a week then they will most likely be more active and alert as they will have sufficient rest, thus decreasing the chances of making errors which could be costly for the company. However, the lecturer says that if the worker only works 4 days then the company have to hire new employees due to which the company has to spend more money on the workers and other costs associated with them such as their medical costs. Moreover, more space in the office will be occupied because of the new employees and it will eventually cut off the profit of the company. Secondly, the article posits that because of this change more people will get jobs to cover up the work left by the employees. However, the lecturer is against this idea and says that the company will have high expectations from the new employees to do the job similarly as it is being done by the employee who left it. Finally, the article states that this change will benefit the employees highly by saying that there will be more free time for them. The employees will be able to have a good time with their family members due to which there will significant improvement in their social as well as family life. However, the lecturer states that the individual might be in risk after the change. According to him, if an employee works for only 4 days a week then the company will surely prioritize the ones who are working 5 days a week. Moreover, if there is any downturn in the company then the ones working 4 days only will have serious chances of losing the job.
The
article
states
that if the
employees
are
allowed
to
work
4 days a
week
instead
of 5 days a
week
then there will significant benefits for the
company
, country and
as well
as the individual. The author provides three reasons of support of this.
However
, the
lecturer
refutes
all of the
claims made by the
article
and
thinks
that it will be more harmful.

First
, the
article
states
that if the
employees
work
only
4 days a
week
then they will most likely be more active and alert as they will have sufficient rest,
thus
decreasing the chances of making errors which could be costly for the
company
.
However
, the
lecturer
says that if the worker
only
works 4 days then the
company
have to
hire new
employees
due to which the
company
has to
spend more money on the workers and other costs associated with them such as their medical costs.
Moreover
, more space in the office will
be occupied
because
of the new
employees
and it will
eventually
cut
off the profit of the
company
.

Secondly
, the
article
posits that
because of this
change
more
people
will
get
jobs to cover up the
work
left
by the
employees
.
However
, the
lecturer
is against this
idea
and says that the
company
will have high expectations from the new
employees
to do the job
similarly
as it is
being done
by the
employee
who
left
it.

Finally
, the
article
states
that this
change
will benefit the
employees
highly
by saying that there will be more free time for them. The
employees
will be able to have a
good
time with their family members due to which there will significant improvement in their social
as well
as family life.
However
, the
lecturer
states
that the individual might be in
risk
after the
change
. According to him, if an
employee
works for
only
4 days a
week
then the
company
will
surely
prioritize the ones who are working 5 days a
week
.
Moreover
, if there is any downturn in the
company
then the ones working 4 days
only
will have serious chances of losing the job.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The article states that if the employees are allowed to work 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week then there will significant benefits for the company, country and as well as the individual. The author provides three reasons of support of this. However,

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
355 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: