Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

TPO35

TPO35 0ABg5
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about who was the author of a mysterious old book which was discovered in 1912. The article strongly postulates that there are three possible authors of this book. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that none of them is the real author of this great manuscript. < br> First and foremost, according to the professor in the lecture, this books contains thousands of secret codes which no one can explain it. Furthermore, Anthony was an ordinary physician who had not such deep-knowledge to create this script. Moreover, Antony's herb was just the common plant mentioned in other medical books. Therefore, there was no evidence to believe that he was its author. Nonetheless, the article offsets these points by declaring that this book might have used as a scientific or magical purpose because there were several high possibilities to believe it. For example, Anthony Ascham who was physician and botanist that illustrated some plants which were very identical with those of ancient book. < br> On top of this, the lecturer further asserts that there was no chance that the author was Edward Kelley who was a fraud that sells fake magical books to wealthy people. To be more specific he did not need to put a lot of hard work on this book to deceive people because the people in sixteen century were naive about such things. In other words, he only wanted to earn money so there was no possibility he was the author. These claims refute the writer's implications about Kelly created this book to sell to rich people and he produced alphabet which was exactly random order. < br> Lastly, the speaker in the lecture suggests that this book's author was not Wilfrid because its ink and page were created in the twelveth century. In other words, Wilfrid could not obtain such rare old ink from his century. Nevertheless, the author counters these implications by insisting that this script was produced by Wilfrid M. Voynich who had enough knowledge to create such masterpiece's fake one. Also, he sold this copy to people who offered enough money to him.
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
was the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
of a mysterious
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
book
which
was discovered
in 1912. The article
strongly
postulates that there are three possible
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authors
of this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
book
. On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, the listening
adamantly
delineates that none of them is the real
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
of this great manuscript.
Possible spelling mistake found.
&lt
;
Possible spelling mistake found.
br&gt
;
First
and foremost, according to the professor in the lecture, this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
books
contains thousands of secret codes which no one can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explain
it.
Furthermore
, Anthony was an ordinary physician
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
had not such deep-knowledge to create this script.
Moreover
, Antony's herb was
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
the common plant mentioned in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
books
.
Therefore
, there was no evidence to believe that he was its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
. Nonetheless, the article offsets these points by declaring that this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
book
might have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as a scientific or magical purpose
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
there were several high possibilities to believe it.
For example
, Anthony
Possible spelling mistake found.
Ascham
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
was physician and botanist that illustrated
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
plants which were
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
identical with those of ancient
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
book
.
Possible spelling mistake found.
&lt
;
Possible spelling mistake found.
br&gt
; On top of this, the lecturer
further
asserts that there was no chance that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
was Edward Kelley
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
was a fraud that sells fake magical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
books
to wealthy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
. To be more specific he did not need to put
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
hard
work on this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
book
to deceive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in sixteen
Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: "centuries".
century
were naive about such things. In
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
words, he
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
wanted to earn money
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
there was no possibility he was the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
. These claims refute the writer's implications about Kelly created this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
book
to sell to rich
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
people and
he produced alphabet which was exactly random order.
Possible spelling mistake found.
&lt
;
Possible spelling mistake found.
br&gt
;
Lastly
, the speaker in the lecture suggests that this book's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
was not
Possible spelling mistake found.
Wilfrid
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
its ink and page
were created
in the
Possible spelling mistake found.
twelveth
century. In
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
words,
Possible spelling mistake found.
Wilfrid
could not obtain such rare
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
ink from his century.
Nevertheless
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
counters these implications by insisting that this script
was produced
by
Possible spelling mistake found.
Wilfrid
M.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Voynich
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
had
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
knowledge to create such masterpiece's fake one.
Also
, he sold this copy to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
offered
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
money to him.

IELTS essay TPO35

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
361 words
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • TPO35