The article asserts that some Russian submarines recorded strange noises and there are different hypotheses about their sources. The teacher completely overthrows all the assumptions mentioned by the author even though she accepts that this phenomenon is debating. In the following, her explanations are discussed thoroughly.
First of all, the reading claims that ocra males and females were the main sources of the noise. However, the professor refutes this idea and says this is highly unlikely even though she thinks it is plausible. She insists that these creatures mostly live near sea surface; therefore, the submarines could not hear them, mainly because they were very deep down the ocean, and the sound of those animals could not reach those submarines.
Secondly, the passage posits that giant squids (a sea predator) were making those sounds. The lecturer rejects this scenario as she refers that first sounds were recorded during 1960's and disappeared after about twenty years surprisingly. Since giant squids have always lived in the area and never leaved there, it is not acceptable to refer to these animals as the sources of the noises owing to the fact that they could not make the noises only for a certain period.
Tertiary, the essay upholds that other countries' submarines were the cause of the noises for they were snicking around the location. Nonetheless, the educator opposes this theory insomuch as she claims that the source moved fast and changed its direction really quickly. Therefore, the sound could not be made by submarines although their engines made some noises and accompanied quackers. Moreover, she acknowledges that those new submarines were constructed by state-of-the-art technologies which enabled them to operate more silently.
The article asserts that
some
Russian
submarines
recorded strange
noises
and there are
different
hypotheses about their
sources
. The teacher completely overthrows all the assumptions mentioned by the author
even though
she accepts that this phenomenon is debating. In the following, her explanations
are discussed
thoroughly
.
First of all
, the reading claims that
ocra
males and females were the main
sources
of the
noise
.
However
, the professor refutes this
idea
and says this is
highly
unlikely
even though
she
thinks
it is plausible. She insists that these creatures
mostly
live
near sea surface;
therefore
, the
submarines
could not hear them,
mainly
because
they were
very
deep down the ocean, and the
sound
of those animals could not reach those submarines.
Secondly
, the passage posits that giant squids (a sea predator) were making those
sounds
. The lecturer rejects this scenario as she refers that
first
sounds
were recorded
during 1960's
and disappeared after about twenty years
surprisingly
. Since giant squids have always
lived
in the area and never leaved there, it is not acceptable to refer to these animals as the
sources
of the
noises
owing to the fact that they could not
make
the
noises
only
for a certain period.
Tertiary, the essay upholds that other countries'
submarines
were the cause of the
noises
for they were snicking around the location. Nonetheless, the educator opposes this theory insomuch as she claims that the
source
moved
fast
and
changed
its direction
really
quickly
.
Therefore
, the
sound
could not
be made
by
submarines
although their engines made
some
noises
and accompanied
quackers
.
Moreover
, she acknowledges that those new
submarines
were constructed
by state-of-the-art technologies which enabled them to operate more
silently
.