The article asserts that there is a big problem with cheatgrass, an invasive non-native plant from Europe and Asia which dwells in North America and threats the native plant species and even affects negatively the native animal habitat. It propses three methods to fight against cheatgrass. On the other hand, the professor mentions that none of those methods are likely to control the cheatgrass propagation well.
First, the reading states that encouraging the cattles to eat cheatgrass will be an effective way to eradicate cheatgrass from the North America fields. Conversely, the lecturer rebuts this opinion by explaining that cattles prefer to eat native grass and unfortunately they eat native grass completely first and then they eat partially cheatgrass. This method will provide cheatgrass with more space and resources withoput a rival through which it could propagate enormousely and cover all fields. Therefore, he directly reject this idea.
Second, the writer suggests that by controled burning fields, cheatgrass, which is a flammable plant, they would wipe out from the field. Controversially, the lecturer mentions that cheatgrass produces myriad seeds, which they will germinate years afterward. The seeds and palnts on the surface may burn but the underground seeds will be remained intact which are able to produce new progenies over the next years, the professor explains. With this justification this solution does not hold water.
Thrid, the author avers that introducing a fungal parasite can kill the cheatgrass and will clear up the fields from this invasive unwanted gest. However, the speaker points out the cheatgrass and this fungus have been living together in Asia and Europe for thousands years; as a result, cheatgrass has developed resistance to cheatgrass. Indeed, this parasite is able to kill only the sick cheatgrass and the healthy grass is in a safe place. Consequently, this method won' taddress this problem.
The article asserts that there is a
big
problem with
cheatgrass
, an invasive non-native plant from Europe and Asia which dwells in North America and threats the
native
plant species and even affects
negatively
the
native
animal habitat. It
propses
three
methods
to fight against
cheatgrass
.
On the other hand
, the professor mentions that none of those
methods
are likely to control the
cheatgrass
propagation well.
First
, the reading states that encouraging the
cattles
to
eat
cheatgrass
will be an effective way to eradicate
cheatgrass
from the North America
fields
.
Conversely
, the lecturer rebuts this opinion by explaining that
cattles
prefer to
eat
native
grass and unfortunately they
eat
native
grass completely
first and
then they
eat
partially
cheatgrass
. This
method
will provide
cheatgrass
with more space and resources
withoput
a rival through which it could propagate
enormousely
and cover all
fields
.
Therefore
, he
directly
reject
this
idea
.
Second, the writer suggests that by
controled
burning
fields
,
cheatgrass
, which is a flammable plant, they would wipe out from the
field
.
Controversially
, the lecturer mentions that
cheatgrass
produces myriad seeds, which they will germinate years afterward. The seeds and
palnts
on the surface may burn
but
the underground seeds will
be remained
intact which are able to produce new
progenies
over the
next
years, the professor
explains
. With this justification this solution does not hold water.
Thrid
, the author avers that introducing a fungal parasite can kill the
cheatgrass
and will
clear
up the
fields
from this invasive unwanted
gest
.
However
, the speaker points out the
cheatgrass
and
this fungus have
been living together in Asia and Europe for thousands years;
as a result
,
cheatgrass
has developed resistance to
cheatgrass
.
Indeed
, this parasite is able to kill
only
the sick
cheatgrass
and the healthy grass is in a safe place.
Consequently
, this
method
won'
taddress
this problem.