It is true that tourists have had tremendous impacts on the host countries’ advancements. Although its negative influences cannot be discarded, I agree that its advantages are remarkably higher.
On the one hand, travellers visiting a country may ruin the environment and cultural values of local residents. One of the most important impacts of tourism is pollution. This means, the more visitors travel and visit one region, the more they pollute the surroundings. The amount of disposals and carbon dioxide are fundamentally increased as more visitors travel a region, destroying the natural habitat. In addition, their habits can be against the local residents’ rules. As a prime example, in Emirate, which is an Arab Islamic country in the Middle East, local people may not tolerate a US traveller wearing a bikini in the public, whereas this clothing is not against cultural values of Americans. As a result, tourist resorts are negatively affected by these two obvious consequences.
On the other hand, definitely this industry has two important influences on the host country, and I believe that despite having some negative impressions, its benefits are far greater. One important reason behind it is that this industry can improve job opportunity for the local inhabitants. Cleary, the more visitors travel to a specific region, the more hotels, restaurants, and shopping centres will be constructed, and more local citizens will find better job positions. For instance, In Kish Island, located in the South of Iran, as the government allowed there to become an open trade place for foreign traders, and more local people have been finding more job opportunities. Another important positive effect is that countries can expose their culture to other nations. In particular, had not Greece become a tourist attraction for Europeans, they would not have known about its historical places and culture.
Since there are tremendous benefits of expansion and popularity of tourism, government and tourism industries can focus on reducing the negative effects by taking many initiatives. The awareness among the visiting tourists could easily be established by giving proper guidance and that would save the environment for getting polluted. The host country should engage more system and manpower to keep the places clean and should impose fine if someone found to violate the rules. The influence of foreign culture among the mass population is another concern that could be tracked by imposing some plausible rules for the visiting tourists.
To sum up, governments of countries can assess the positive and negative influences of tourism by looking at cultural, environmental, and vocational aspects. From my perspective, visiting more tourists, local residents can find not only better job positions, but their culture will become more recognisable to other nations. Reducing the bad effects of tourism is another concern that the government and people of the host country can easily control.
It is true that
tourists
have had tremendous impacts on the
host
countries’
advancements. Although its
negative
influences
cannot
be discarded
, I
agree
that its advantages are
remarkably
higher.
On the one hand,
travellers
visiting a
country
may ruin the environment and cultural values of
local
residents. One of the most
important
impacts of
tourism
is pollution. This means, the more visitors travel and visit one region, the more they pollute the surroundings. The amount of disposals and carbon dioxide are
fundamentally
increased as more visitors travel a region, destroying the natural habitat.
In addition
, their habits can be against the
local
residents’
rules
. As a prime example, in Emirate, which is an Arab Islamic
country
in the Middle East,
local
people
may not tolerate a US
traveller
wearing a bikini in the public, whereas this clothing is not against cultural values of Americans.
As a result
,
tourist
resorts are
negatively
affected
by these two obvious consequences.
On the other hand
, definitely this industry has two
important
influences
on the
host
country
, and I believe that despite having
some
negative
impressions, its benefits are far greater. One
important
reason behind it is that this industry can
improve
job
opportunity for the
local
inhabitants.
Cleary
, the more visitors travel to a specific region, the more hotels, restaurants, and shopping
centres
will
be constructed
, and more
local
citizens will find better
job
positions.
For instance
, In
Kish
Island, located in the South of Iran, as the
government
allowed
there to become an open trade place for foreign traders, and more
local
people
have been finding more
job
opportunities. Another
important
positive
effect is that
countries
can expose their culture to other nations.
In particular
, had not Greece become a
tourist
attraction for Europeans, they would not have known about its historical places and culture.
Since there are tremendous benefits of expansion and popularity of
tourism
,
government
and
tourism
industries can focus on reducing the
negative
effects by taking
many
initiatives. The awareness among the visiting
tourists
could
easily
be established
by giving proper guidance and that would save the environment for getting polluted. The
host
country
should engage more system and manpower to
keep
the places clean and should impose fine if someone found to violate the
rules
.
The
influence
of foreign culture among the mass population is another concern that could be
tracked
by imposing
some
plausible
rules
for the visiting tourists.
To sum up,
governments
of
countries
can assess the
positive
and
negative
influences
of
tourism
by looking at cultural, environmental, and vocational aspects. From my perspective, visiting more
tourists
,
local
residents can find not
only
better
job
positions,
but
their culture will become more
recognisable
to other nations. Reducing the
bad
effects of
tourism
is another concern that the
government
and
people
of the
host
country
can
easily
control.