Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

too much attention and too many resources to save wildlife.

too much attention and too many resources to save wildlife. e3pkp
It is an undeniable fact that nowadays, wild animals are in danger of extinction and authorities are trying to implement key measures for protecting them. In contrast, other people hold the view that the human is paying too much attention and too many resources to save wildlife. Therefore, from my point of view, I am totally in agreement with this opinion. Starting with the first main point, I strongly agree that the human has an overemphasis in saving wildlife because of some following reasons. The first reason I would mention is that wild animals seem to not create major influences on people as other creatures. A good example is vegetation that produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilize the earth’s climate. If they are in danger of extinction, people tend to not have enough oxygen to breathe. As a result, human’s survival can face a big danger. By contrast for the animal, for instance, in the past when dinosaurs disappeared but people still have strongly developed as today. In my opinion, people protect animals typically because of the ethical issue. Therefore, we should not be an exaggeration in saving them. The second reason could be explained that authorities should allocate substantial resources to address other more essential problems. For instance, today, in the world, there is still a wide range of disadvantaged people who still cannot meet their basic needs, such as food, healthcare or education or even many people are suffering some life-threatening diseases, such as HIV and cancer that have not been treated. Thus, it is necessary for governments to hold a strong attraction for helping people rather than others. Last but not least, authorities can come up with some simple solutions for protecting wild animals. For instance, government leaders can build the awareness of saving the wildlife and impose some heavy punishments for poachers who damage wild animals. In this way, governments can save a large amount of money from this solution. In short, there are several reasons that I totally agree that too much attention and too many resources to save wildlife. In a nutshell, I would come up with the conclusion that, I strongly endorse that wild animals and birds need be defended. However, it is not worth for authorities to be costly for saving them.
It is an undeniable fact that nowadays, wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
danger
of extinction and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
are trying to implement key measures for protecting them.
In contrast
, other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
hold the view that the human is paying too much attention and too
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
resources to save wildlife.
Therefore
, from my point of view, I am
totally
in agreement with this opinion.

Starting with the
first
main point, I
strongly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
that the human has an overemphasis in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
saving
wildlife
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
following
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reasons
. The
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reason
I would mention is that wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
seem to not create major influences on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
as other creatures. A
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
example is vegetation that produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilize the earth’s climate. If they are in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
danger
of extinction,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
tend to not have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
oxygen to breathe.
As a result
, human’s survival can face a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
danger
. By contrast for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
,
for instance
, in the past when dinosaurs disappeared
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
still
have
strongly
developed as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
. In my opinion,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
protect
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
typically
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the ethical issue.
Therefore
, we should not be an exaggeration in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
saving
them.

The second
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reason
could be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explained
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
should allocate substantial resources to address other more essential problems.
For instance
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
, in the world, there is
still
a wide range of disadvantaged
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who
still
cannot
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
meet
their basic needs, such as food, healthcare or education or even
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are suffering
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
life-threatening diseases, such as HIV and cancer that have not
been treated
.
Thus
, it is necessary for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
to hold a strong attraction for helping
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
rather
than others.

Last
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not least,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
up with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
simple solutions for protecting wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
For instance
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
leaders can build the awareness of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
saving
the wildlife and impose
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
heavy punishments for poachers who damage wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. In this way,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
can save a large amount of money from this solution. In short, there are several
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reasons
that I
totally
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
that too much attention and too
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
resources to save wildlife.

Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
In
a nutshell, I would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
up with the conclusion that, I
strongly
endorse that wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and birds need
be defended
.
However
, it is not worth for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
to be costly for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
saving
them.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay too much attention and too many resources to save wildlife.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
381 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • too much attention and too many resources to save wildlife.