Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

TOEFLbank airfilters

TOEFLbank airfilters kYje2
In this set of material, the reading and listening is both about Air purifiers. The article strongly postulates that airpurifiers are of paramount importance to remove air pollution, and provide three extensively used types of airpurifiers. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that these air purifiers are not as effective as described each has a shortcoming, and gainsays each of them. First and foremost, the writer begins by asserting that Hepa filters can remove the allergens since they have folded fibre sheeth that can entraps the dust particles and pollens. As a result secondary pollution cannot produce. The lecturer refutes this claim by stating that hepa filters can not ger rid of the extremely smaller particles. He exemplifies that by pollutants particles, allergens ane viruses who are samller than. 03mm, they can easily escape from hepa filter. As a result thet grow and multiply in the air and continue to cause air pollution. Hence, hepa filters are notb effective. Furthermore, the speaker posits that ozone gnerating air purifiers are dangerous to many extent. To be more specific, if the concentration of ozone is increased to diminish the smell, it would cause serious reaction to the eyes, and also affect the lungs and other body parts of humans. He goes on saying that it affect would be similar to the gasoline which is highly toxic. These claims clearly refutes the writer implication that ozone generating purifiers would be great as they use ozone which produce pleasent smell and purify the air from toxins. Ultimately, the writers wraps up its argument by declaring that UV purifiers have the benefit that they kill the bacterial production and clean the environment without producing much noise. Not surprisingly, the speaker takes an issue with that by contending that uv filters can not clear away the dust and other harmful molecules. For instance, cigarettes smoke and other gasses would still not be cleared away. Consequently, their puprpose of removing basic dust particles from air would not be fulfilled.
In this set of material, the reading and listening is both about
Air
purifiers
. The article
strongly
postulates that
airpurifiers
are of paramount importance to remove
air
pollution, and provide three
extensively
used
types of
airpurifiers
. On the
other
hand, the lecturer mentions that these
air
purifiers
are not as effective as
described
each has a shortcoming, and gainsays each of them.

First
and foremost, the writer
begins
by asserting that
Hepa
filters
can remove the allergens since they have folded
fibre
sheeth
that can entraps the dust
particles
and
pollens
.
As
a result secondary pollution cannot produce. The lecturer refutes this claim by stating that
hepa
filters
can not
ger
rid of the
extremely smaller
particles
. He exemplifies that by pollutants
particles
,
allergens ane
viruses who are
samller
than.
03mm
, they can
easily
escape from
hepa
filter
.
As a result
thet
grow and multiply in the
air
and continue to cause
air
pollution.
Hence
,
hepa
filters
are
notb
effective.

Furthermore
, the speaker posits that ozone
gnerating
air
purifiers
are
dangerous
to
many extent
. To be more specific, if the concentration of ozone
is increased
to diminish the smell, it would cause serious reaction to the eyes, and
also
affect the lungs and
other
body parts of humans. He goes on saying that it affect would be similar to the gasoline which is
highly
toxic. These claims
clearly
refutes the writer implication that ozone generating
purifiers
would be great as they
use
ozone which produce
pleasent
smell and purify the
air
from toxins.

Ultimately
, the writers wraps up its argument by declaring that UV
purifiers
have the benefit that they kill the bacterial production and clean the environment without producing much noise. Not
surprisingly
, the speaker takes an issue with that by contending that
uv
filters
can not
clear
away the dust and
other
harmful molecules.
For instance
, cigarettes smoke and
other
gasses would
still
not
be cleared
away.
Consequently
, their
puprpose
of removing basic dust
particles
from
air
would not
be fulfilled
.

IELTS essay TOEFLbank airfilters

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
333 words
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: