The article states that reward should be given to employee in order to achieve more productivity. and provides three reasons of support. However, Professor explains that by giving rewards to employee may reduce the productivity and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that some enterprises offers compensations such as special promotions, extra priviledges or luxury vacations in order to make employee happy and that will increase productivity. The professor refutes this point by saying that what if employee don't want to go on vacation. Employee may want rewards in terms of money. He or she want to be paid extra for their hard work. He states that this might demotivate employee.
Second, the article posits that if promises are given to employee that they will be rewarded it will improve employee's attitude, motivation and this all will converted into increase in productivity. The professor refutes this point by saying that such promises might work negetively. He states that company will value them only if they work hard. They may be feel manipulated by their senior management. This may deteriorate company's productivity.
Third, the reading says that greater reward should be given to the person who perform the best. The professor opposes this point by saying that this policy of rewarding might worsen the relation between the manager and their employee. He says that what if employee get more rewards or money then his successive manager. The in future his manager may be jelous of him and he will not support in his decision and show his employee's talent to higher management to grow further.
The article states that
reward
should be
given
to
employee
in order to achieve more
productivity
.
and
provides three reasons of support.
However
,
Professor
explains
that by giving
rewards
to
employee
may
reduce
the
productivity
and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First
, the reading claims that
some
enterprises offers compensations such as special promotions, extra
priviledges
or luxury vacations in order to
make
employee
happy and that will increase
productivity
. The
professor
refutes this point by saying that what if
employee
don't want to go on vacation.
Employee
may want
rewards
in terms of money. He or she
want
to
be paid
extra for their
hard
work. He states that this might demotivate employee.
Second, the article posits that if promises are
given
to
employee
that they will
be rewarded
it will
improve
employee's attitude, motivation and this all will
converted
into increase in
productivity
. The
professor
refutes this point by saying that such promises might work
negetively
. He states that
company
will value them
only
if they work
hard
. They may be
feel
manipulated by their senior management. This may deteriorate
company
's productivity.
Third, the reading says that greater
reward
should be
given
to the person who perform the best. The
professor
opposes this point by saying that this policy of rewarding might worsen the relation between the manager and their
employee
. He says that what if
employee
get
more
rewards
or money then his successive manager. The in future his manager may be
jelous
of
him and
he will not support in his decision and
show
his employee's talent to higher management to grow
further
.