Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

to what extent do you agree or disagree

to what extent do you agree or disagree O8jE
Governments should not fund the arts according to some people, because they think that the money allocated on the arts could be used in some areas that would be better. In my opinion, if there is no arts in any country, people do not live fully. So, governments should encourage artists to prevent extinction of art, as the arts is the culture of a country. On the one hand, governments should support artists to enrich their culture. If artists produce more work of art, they contribute to society and in this way to the culture. For example, the whole world knows Shakespeare and his artworks. He is the part of British culture. So, if he did not get any fundings, we do not know anything about him and British culture would be missing. Another example, Norway has a fundings for young artists. If someone decide to write a book, the government pay for them to write, and libraries have to buy their books. These fundings show that the more government encourage the artists, the more the arts are improved. On the other hand, some countries do not support their own artists to produce anything. They let corporates do the any kinds of fundings. In this way, many talented artists are wasted, because corporates pay them if only they follow the strict rules. For example, some corporates are afraid of the government in Turkey, which have a dictator, so, they do not want to fund any artist who is opposite of the government. Therefore, many talented opponent artists do not get any money from them, and from the government. This situation cause the cultural corruption. In conclusion, the governments should support their artists to keep the culture alive and enrich their countries' values. As we see the examples, if they encourage their people to produce work of art, they have more national values.
Governments
should not fund the
arts
according to
some
people
,
because
they
think
that the money allocated on the
arts
could be
used
in
some
areas that would be better. In my opinion, if there is no
arts
in any country,
people
do not
live
fully
.
So
,
governments
should encourage
artists
to
prevent
extinction of
art
, as the
arts
is the
culture
of a country.

On the one hand,
governments
should support
artists
to enrich their
culture
. If
artists
produce more work of
art
, they contribute to society and in this way to the
culture
. For
example
, the whole world knows Shakespeare and his artworks. He is the part of British
culture
.
So
, if he did not
get
any
fundings
, we do not know anything about him and British
culture
would be missing. Another
example
, Norway has a
fundings
for young
artists
. If someone
decide
to write a book, the
government
pay for them to write, and libraries
have to
buy
their books. These
fundings
show
that the more
government
encourage the
artists
, the more the
arts
are
improved
.

On the other hand
,
some
countries do not support their
own
artists
to produce anything. They
let
corporates
do the any kinds of
fundings
. In this way,
many
talented
artists
are wasted
,
because
corporates pay
them if
only
they follow the strict
rules
. For
example
,
some
corporates
are afraid of the
government
in Turkey, which have a dictator,
so
, they do not want to fund any
artist
who is opposite of the
government
.
Therefore
,
many
talented opponent
artists
do not
get
any money from them, and from the
government
. This situation
cause
the cultural corruption.

In conclusion
, the
governments
should support their
artists
to
keep
the
culture
alive and enrich their countries' values. As we
see
the
examples
, if they encourage their
people
to produce work of
art
, they have more national values.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay to what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
312 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts