The statement linking technology negatively with free thinking plays on recent human experience over the past century. Surely there has been no time in history where the lived lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on a typical day reveals how technology has revolutionized the world. Most people commute to work in an automobile that runs on an internal combustion engine. During the workday, chances are high that the employee will interact with a computer that processes information on silicon bridges that are. 09 microns wide. Upon leaving home, family members will be reached through wireless networks that utilize satellites orbiting the earth. Each of these common occurrences could have been inconceivable at the turn of the 19th century.
The statement attempts to bridge these dramatic changes to a reduction in the ability for humans to think for themselves. The assumption is that an increased reliance on technology negates the need for people to think creatively to solve previous quandaries. Looking back at the introduction, one could argue that without a car, computer, or mobile phone, the hypothetical worker would need to find alternate methods of transport, information processing and communication. Technology short circuits this thinking by making the problems obsolete.
However, this reliance on technology does not necessarily preclude the creativity that marks the human species. The prior examples reveal that technology allows for convenience. The car, computer and phone all release additional time for people to live more efficiently. This efficiency does not preclude the need for humans to think for themselves. In fact, technology frees humanity to not only tackle new problems, but may itself create new issues that did not exist without technology. For example, the proliferation of automobiles has introduced a need for fuel conservation on a global scale. With increasing energy demands from emerging markets, global warming becomes a concern inconceivable to the horse-and-buggy generation. Likewise dependence on oil has created nation-states that are not dependent on taxation, allowing ruling parties to oppress minority groups such as women. Solutions to these complex problems require the unfettered imaginations of maverick scientists and politicians.
In contrast to the statement, we can even see how technology frees the human imagination. Consider how the digital revolution and the advent of the internet has allowed for an unprecedented exchange of ideas. WebMD, a popular internet portal for medical information, permits patients to self research symptoms for a more informed doctor visit. This exercise opens pathways of thinking that were previously closed off to the medical layman. With increased interdisciplinary interactions, inspiration can arrive from the most surprising corners. Jeffrey Sachs, one of the architects of the UN Millenium Development Goals, based his ideas on emergency care triage techniques. The unlikely marriage of economics and medicine has healed tense, hyperinflation environments from South America to Eastern Europe.
This last example provides the most hope in how technology actually provides hope to the future of humanity. By increasing our reliance on technology, impossible goals can now be achieved. Consider how the late 20th century witnessed the complete elimination of smallpox. This disease had ravaged the human race since prehistorical days, and yet with the technology of vaccines, free thinking humans dared to imagine a world free of smallpox. Using technology, battle plans were drawn out, and smallpox was systematically targeted and eradicated.
Technology will always mark the human experience, from the discovery of fire to the implementation of nanotechnology. Given the history of the human race, there will be no limit to the number of problems, both new and old, for us to tackle. There is no need to retreat to a Luddite attitude to new things, but rather embrace a hopeful posture to the possibilities that technology provides for new avenues of human imagination.
The statement linking
technology
negatively
with
free
thinking
plays on recent
human
experience over the past century.
Surely
there has been no time in history where the
lived
lives
of
people
have
changed
more
dramatically
. A quick reflection on a typical day reveals how
technology
has revolutionized the world. Most
people
commute to work in an automobile that runs on an internal combustion engine. During the workday, chances are high that the employee will interact with a computer that processes information on silicon bridges that are. 09 microns wide. Upon leaving home, family members will
be reached
through wireless networks that utilize satellites orbiting the earth. Each of these common occurrences could have been inconceivable at the turn of the 19th century.
The statement attempts to bridge these dramatic
changes
to a reduction in the ability for
humans
to
think
for themselves. The assumption is that an increased reliance on
technology
negates the
need
for
people
to
think
creatively
to solve previous quandaries. Looking back at the introduction, one could argue that without a car, computer, or mobile phone, the hypothetical worker would
need
to find alternate methods of transport, information processing and communication.
Technology
short circuits this
thinking
by making the
problems
obsolete.
However
, this reliance on
technology
does not
necessarily
preclude the creativity that marks the
human
species. The prior examples reveal that
technology
allows
for convenience. The car, computer and phone all release additional time for
people
to
live
more
efficiently
. This efficiency does not preclude the
need
for
humans
to
think
for themselves. In fact,
technology
frees
humanity to not
only
tackle
new
problems
,
but
may itself create
new
issues that did not exist without
technology
.
For example
, the proliferation of automobiles has introduced a
need
for fuel conservation on a global scale. With increasing energy demands from emerging markets, global warming becomes a concern inconceivable to the horse-and-buggy generation.
Likewise
dependence on oil has created nation-states that are not dependent on taxation, allowing ruling parties to oppress minority groups such as women. Solutions to these complex
problems
require the unfettered imaginations of maverick scientists and politicians.
In contrast
to the statement, we can even
see
how
technology
frees
the
human
imagination. Consider how the digital revolution and the advent of the internet has
allowed
for an unprecedented exchange of
ideas
. WebMD, a popular internet portal for medical information, permits patients to self research symptoms for a more informed doctor visit. This exercise opens pathways of
thinking
that were previously closed off to the medical layman. With increased interdisciplinary interactions, inspiration can arrive from the most surprising corners. Jeffrey Sachs, one of the architects of the UN
Millenium
Development Goals, based his
ideas
on emergency care triage techniques. The unlikely marriage of economics and medicine has healed tense, hyperinflation environments from South America to Eastern Europe.
This last example provides the most hope in how
technology
actually provides hope to the future of humanity. By increasing our reliance on
technology
, impossible goals can
now
be achieved
. Consider how the late 20th century witnessed the complete elimination of smallpox. This disease had ravaged the
human
race since prehistorical days, and
yet
with the
technology
of vaccines,
free
thinking
humans
dared to imagine a world
free
of smallpox. Using
technology
, battle plans
were drawn
out, and smallpox was
systematically
targeted and eradicated.
Technology will always mark the
human
experience, from the discovery of fire to the implementation of nanotechnology.
Given
the history of the
human
race, there will be no limit to the number of
problems
, both
new
and
old
, for us to tackle. There is no
need
to retreat to a Luddite attitude to
new
things,
but
rather
embrace a hopeful posture to the possibilities that
technology
provides for
new
avenues of
human
imagination.