The solution to most problems that societies confront is a higher level of political sophistication that results from more education When people have the facts about the issues they will be clearer thinkers and better citizens Most people depend on broadc
The solution to most problems that societies confront is a higher level of political sophistication that results from more education When people have the facts about the issues they will be clearer thinkers and better citizens Most people depend on broadc XG7mY
In the set of materials, the reading passage states that higher education solves most of the problems in our society. However, the professor in the lecture refutes the author’s points and explains why higher education is not effective in solving the problems.
Firstly, according to the reading passage, when people have more knowledge and information about a fact or a problem, they can know the truth or the issue; therefore, they can reject misinformation and rumors. In contrast, the professor claims that facts do not have an effect on people’s choice. Knowing facts is not curing the misinformation or the issue because people do not change their opinion by knowing more facts. News and print media spread new facts to change the opinion of people, but unfortunately, this method is not effective.
Secondly, the reading asserts that when people have more knowledge and information, they can understand both the positive and negative opinions, and clarify all sides of the issues. Quite the opposite, the professor indicates that people vote for their beliefs rather than facts. Sometimes, they twist the facts to fit their beliefs. According to the professor, individuals reject any new information if it does not fit their beliefs. In some cases, even the information is bad and hazardous, they makes it fit with their beliefs in order to accept it.
Thirdly, the reading passage posits that threatened persons will search for the truth, due to their natural instinct. On the other hand, the professor mentions that people will not listen to new information when they are threatened. Using this fact, some politicians try to manipulate people and change people’s opinion. For instance, when people fear, they do not accept the opposite viewpoints about a candidate in an election or discussion. As the professor said, it is easier to control people when they are in a state of fear.
In the set of materials, the
reading
passage states that higher education solves most of the problems in our society.
However
, the
professor
in the lecture refutes the author’s points and
explains
why higher education is not effective in solving the problems.
Firstly
, according to the
reading
passage, when
people
have more knowledge and
information
about a
fact
or a problem, they can know the truth or the issue;
therefore
, they can reject misinformation and rumors.
In contrast
, the
professor
claims that facts do not have an effect on
people’s
choice. Knowing facts is not curing the misinformation or the issue
because
people
do not
change
their
opinion
by knowing more facts.
News
and print media spread
new
facts to
change
the
opinion
of
people
,
but
unfortunately, this method is not effective.
Secondly
, the
reading
asserts that when
people
have more knowledge and
information
, they can understand both the
positive
and
negative
opinions
, and clarify all sides of the issues. Quite the opposite, the
professor
indicates that
people
vote for their
beliefs
rather
than facts.
Sometimes
, they twist the facts to fit their
beliefs
. According to the
professor
, individuals reject any
new
information
if it does not fit their
beliefs
. In
some
cases, even the
information
is
bad
and hazardous, they
makes
it fit with their
beliefs
in order to accept it.
Thirdly
, the
reading
passage posits that threatened persons will search for the truth, due to their natural instinct.
On the other hand
, the
professor
mentions that
people
will not listen to
new
information
when they
are threatened
. Using this
fact
,
some
politicians try to manipulate
people
and
change
people’s
opinion
.
For instance
, when
people
fear, they do not accept the opposite viewpoints about a candidate in an election or discussion. As the
professor
said, it is easier to control
people
when they are in a state of fear.